Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
2 days ago comment added Username_qs According to the numerical calculations, there won't be rational numbers $a_n$ such that $\operatorname{Li}_2(-\frac12)=a_1\zeta(2)+a_2\beta(2)+a_3\pi\ln2+a_4\ln^22$. And the similarity of the Direct Sum Conjecture on multiple zeta value is speculated, so I think there's no closed form for $\operatorname{Li}_2(-\frac12)$.
Jul 5 at 4:20 comment added Srini Agreed, but I knew that from dilogarithm property relating dilog($z^2$) to dilog(z)+dilog(-z). But the wishful closed form in my mind should not have another dilog term in the result.
Jul 5 at 4:12 comment added FDP $\operatorname{Li}_{2}(-\frac12)$ is equal to a rational combination of $\operatorname{Li}_{2}(\frac14)$, $\zeta(2)$,$\ln^2 2$.
Jul 5 at 4:04 comment added FDP As i said, there is argument (not proof) that dilog(-1/2) is not equal to $a\ln 2+b\zeta(2)$ with $a,b$ rational numbers.
Jul 5 at 4:01 comment added Srini Not expecting, but wishful thinking. Something like $\operatorname{Li}_{2}(\frac12)$
Jul 5 at 3:58 comment added FDP What kind of closed-form are you expecting for $\text{Li}_2\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)$? Empirically one knows this is not a rational combination of $\zeta(2)$ and $\ln 2$.
Jul 5 at 3:54 comment added FDP There is a more simpler series for $\text{Li}_2\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)$ since $\displaystyle \text{Li}_2\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right)=\frac{1}{2}\int_0^1\frac{\ln x}{1+\frac{x}{2}}dx$
S Jul 5 at 1:18 history suggested David Galea CC BY-SA 4.0
Minor Latex Edits (formatting of Li)
Jul 5 at 0:57 review Suggested edits
S Jul 5 at 1:18
Jul 2 at 13:39 history edited Srini
Changed tags to add polylog
Jul 2 at 6:25 history asked Srini CC BY-SA 4.0