Timeline for Smallest "diamond-number" above some power of ten?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 5 at 18:34 | answer | added | Oleg567 | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 28 at 19:56 | comment | added | Peter | Not really a context , but I am interested whether there are expressions "surprisingly" having a large square of a prime as a factor. With "surprisingly" , I mean expression not constructed for this purpose. To get a feeling how likely such numbers are , I try to examine those numbers. | |
Jun 28 at 19:54 | comment | added | Peter | new record | |
Jun 28 at 17:51 | history | edited | Bill Dubuque |
edited tags
|
|
Jun 28 at 12:52 | comment | added | Chris Lewis | Is there any context for this? It looks like a slightly odd set of conditions in isolation, but if the question has arisen "naturally" from something else, it might be worth seeing if your results for lower powers of $10$ form a known sequence in OEIS or elsewhere. | |
Jun 28 at 11:21 | comment | added | Peter | @Lucenaposition Correct , and considering how many numbers have to be checked , also soon totally infeasible. | |
Jun 28 at 11:13 | comment | added | Lucenaposition | Factorising numbers is believed to be hard in general. | |
Jun 28 at 11:03 | history | asked | Peter | CC BY-SA 4.0 |