Timeline for Does the monoid of non-zero representations with the tensor product admit unique factorization?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 22 at 20:38 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | It's notation that gets used in some corners of geometric representation theory. There people do things like take $G$ to be an algebraic group and consider the quotient $G/G$ in a stacky sense. | |
Jun 22 at 20:37 | comment | added | Smiley1000 | Thanks. Although I must admit that writing $G/G$ and implying the action by conjugation is something I've never seen before, perhaps also a little too ambiguous. | |
Jun 22 at 20:35 | comment | added | Qiaochu Yuan | @Smiley1000: here $G/G$ means the quotient of $G$ by the action of $G$ by conjugation, so it denotes the set of conjugacy classes. Then a function $G/G \to \mathbb{C}$ is a complex-valued function on the set of conjugacy classes. By "representation ring over $\mathbb{C}$" I meant $R(G) \otimes \mathbb{C}$, I guess that was ambiguous. | |
Jun 22 at 20:33 | comment | added | Smiley1000 | What do you mean by "$G/G \to \mathbb{C}$"? Also, doesn't this confuse the representation ring $R(G)$ with the algebra $R(G) \otimes \mathbb{C}$? | |
Jun 22 at 20:32 | vote | accept | Smiley1000 | ||
Jun 22 at 19:18 | history | answered | Qiaochu Yuan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |