Timeline for Associativity of infinite products
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Jun 24 at 8:07 | history | bounty ended | Hilbert Jr. | ||
| S Jun 24 at 8:07 | history | notice removed | Hilbert Jr. | ||
| Jun 24 at 8:07 | vote | accept | Hilbert Jr. | ||
| Jun 27 at 9:32 | |||||
| Jun 23 at 10:45 | answer | added | Joshua Tilley | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jun 23 at 9:42 | history | edited | Hilbert Jr. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarified the question.
|
| Jun 23 at 9:32 | comment | added | Hilbert Jr. | @mathworker21 there are no assumptions on the $z_j$'s, these are simply complex numbers. The assumption is simply that the product $\prod_jz_j$ converge absolutely, according to the specified definitions. | |
| Jun 23 at 2:21 | comment | added | mick | Multiplication of complex numbers is associative as is their real norms. | |
| Jun 23 at 2:05 | comment | added | mathworker21 | can you write your questions in full? what are you assuming about the $z_j$'s? it's not clear to me what the assumptions are | |
| S Jun 22 at 20:30 | history | bounty started | Hilbert Jr. | ||
| S Jun 22 at 20:30 | history | notice added | Hilbert Jr. | Improve details | |
| Jun 13 at 10:14 | history | edited | Hilbert Jr. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 3 characters in body
|
| S May 22 at 1:04 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S May 22 at 1:04 | history | notice removed | CommunityBot | ||
| May 20 at 21:42 | answer | added | Calum Gilhooley | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 16 at 12:55 | comment | added | Statistic Dean | It would be commutativity rather than associativity right ? | |
| S May 13 at 23:54 | history | bounty started | Hilbert Jr. | ||
| S May 13 at 23:54 | history | notice added | Hilbert Jr. | Draw attention | |
| S May 12 at 4:02 | history | suggested | Masd |
relevant tags added
|
|
| May 12 at 3:45 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 12 at 4:02 | |||||
| May 10 at 23:37 | history | asked | Hilbert Jr. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |