Timeline for Generate superset with maximum overlap
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
30 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 21 at 4:04 | history | edited | RobPratt |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 21 at 3:01 | comment | added | D.W. | Thank you for your kind words. There were reasons provided for the closure: I left comments which explained the ambiguities, and those preceded the closure. Those issues were not addressed until after the question was closed. However, I agree that the question could have been re-opened more promptly, once the ambiguities were addressed by your subsequent edit. | |
| S Apr 21 at 1:18 | comment | added | Tarique | @D.W Thank you for providing a detailed answer and re-opening the question. I understand that editorial remarks don't belong in the question but I only did it after multiple edits to get the question reopened was ignored. It is not at all helpful for a QnA site to close questions without providing definite reasons. We are all trying to learn here | |
| S Apr 21 at 1:18 | vote | accept | Tarique | ||
| Apr 20 at 23:30 | history | edited | Asaf Karagila♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 20 at 20:15 | answer | added | D.W. | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 20 at 20:04 | comment | added | D.W. | To learn more, see math.stackexchange.com/help/closed-questions and math.meta.stackexchange.com/a/37370/14578 and meta.stackexchange.com/q/19126/160917. To me, it looks like what happened in this case was that the question was put on hold because there were some ambiguities that were not resolved. Then you edited the question to resolve those ambiguities, but also added editorial remarks that don't belong in questions. I edited the question to remove those editorial remarks and focus the question, and it has now been re-opened. | |
| Apr 20 at 20:04 | comment | added | D.W. | @Tarique, it looks like you might be a little bit new here, so I don't know how familiar you are with how the site works. Questions that aren't sufficiently clear or need additional work are put on hold to give you a chance to revise them before anyone answers; once they're edited, they can be considered for re-opening (and I have voted to re-open your question, and if you give it a little time I'm confident it will be re-opened). Our experience is that this helps avoid problems. | |
| Apr 20 at 20:02 | history | reopened |
Eric Wofsey D.W. Haris Aig peterwhy |
||
| Apr 20 at 19:59 | history | left closed in review |
Julio Puerta José Carlos Santos Another User |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| S Apr 20 at 19:49 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 20 at 19:59 | |||||
| S Apr 20 at 19:49 | history | edited | D.W. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Clarify problem statement, simplify the wording. Focus only on the question. Editorial remarks don't belong in the question.
Added to review
|
| Apr 20 at 16:39 | history | left closed in review |
Another User José Carlos Santos Ricky |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| Apr 20 at 16:13 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 20 at 16:39 | |||||
| Apr 20 at 15:49 | history | left closed in review |
amWhy Ѕᴀᴀᴅ José Carlos Santos |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| S Apr 20 at 15:22 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 20 at 15:49 | |||||
| S Apr 20 at 15:22 | history | edited | Tarique | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 195 characters in body
Added to review
|
| Apr 20 at 14:57 | history | left closed in review |
Ricky amWhy José Carlos Santos |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| Apr 20 at 14:53 | history | edited | Tarique | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 67 characters in body
|
| S Apr 20 at 14:42 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 20 at 14:57 | |||||
| S Apr 20 at 14:42 | history | edited | Tarique | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 505 characters in body
Added to review
|
| Apr 20 at 14:36 | history | left closed in review |
Ѕᴀᴀᴅ José Carlos Santos Another User |
Original close reason(s) were not resolved | |
| Apr 20 at 14:01 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 20 at 14:36 | |||||
| Apr 20 at 14:01 | history | edited | Tarique | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 120 characters in body
Added to review
|
| S Apr 20 at 3:59 | history | closed |
Karl kodlu Harish Chandra Rajpoot Leucippus D.W. |
Not suitable for this site | |
| S Apr 20 at 3:59 | comment | added | D.W. | Does this answer your question? Is Minimum Coverage Problem NP-hard? | |
| Apr 19 at 19:37 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 20 at 4:05 | |||||
| Apr 19 at 19:01 | history | edited | D.W. | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Improve typesetting, English, and tags.
|
| S Apr 19 at 7:28 | review | First questions | |||
| Apr 19 at 7:32 | |||||
| S Apr 19 at 7:28 | history | asked | Tarique | CC BY-SA 4.0 |