Skip to main content
Re: comment on Solovay model on how it has dependent choice
Source Link
Akiva Weinberger
  • 23.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 111

Just to collect some of the comments into an answer:

  • Unsolvability of the word problem for groups, that is, there exist groups for which there is no algorithm determining when two elements are equal
  • Unsolvability of the general quintic (and unsolvability of particular quintics such as $x^5-x+1=0$) in terms of radicals
  • To the Pythagoreans, existence of irrationals (in particular, irrationality of $\sqrt2$)
  • Russell's paradox, and in particular, the inconsistency of Frege's set theory
  • Rice's theorem that, roughly, all "interesting" questions about programs are undecidable. (The halting problem, the mother of all undecidable problems, is a special case.)
  • The category $\sf Top$, whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are continuous functions, is not Cartesian closed, in particular it does not have exponential objects. This motivates the search for "nicer" categories of topological spaces
  • Hilbert's tenth problem : there is no algorithm for polynomial Diophantine equations.
  • Noneuclidean geometry. In one way, mathematicians were disappointed by the proof that the parallel postulate did not follow from the other more intuitive axioms. That disappointment was clearly tempered by the pleasure in expanding the idea of a geometry.
  • The existence of non-measurable sets in set theory with the axiom of choice. (Partly tempered by the Solovay model, a model of set theory without the (full) axiom of choice in which every set is measurable, though I don't know how much working measure theorists care about it.)
  • The independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC set theory, on the existence of a set of intermediate cardinality between the naturals and the reals. Georg Cantor tried to prove it for many years, and it was Hilbert's first problem in his 1900 address. Gödel proved its consistency with ZFC in 1940, and Cohen proved the consistency of its negation in 1963.
  • The Weierstrass function, the first continuous nowhere-differentiable function, got some pretty nasty comments thrown its way
  • Arrow's impossibility theorem that, when there are at least three alternatives, there is no ranked voting system (other than dictatorship!) that satisfies two reasonable-sounding conditions. Informally, every ranked voting system sacrifices some form of "fairness".

Just to collect some of the comments into an answer:

  • Unsolvability of the word problem for groups, that is, there exist groups for which there is no algorithm determining when two elements are equal
  • Unsolvability of the general quintic (and unsolvability of particular quintics such as $x^5-x+1=0$) in terms of radicals
  • To the Pythagoreans, existence of irrationals (in particular, irrationality of $\sqrt2$)
  • Russell's paradox, and in particular, the inconsistency of Frege's set theory
  • Rice's theorem that, roughly, all "interesting" questions about programs are undecidable. (The halting problem, the mother of all undecidable problems, is a special case.)
  • The category $\sf Top$, whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are continuous functions, is not Cartesian closed, in particular it does not have exponential objects. This motivates the search for "nicer" categories of topological spaces
  • Hilbert's tenth problem : there is no algorithm for polynomial Diophantine equations.
  • Noneuclidean geometry. In one way, mathematicians were disappointed by the proof that the parallel postulate did not follow from the other more intuitive axioms. That disappointment was clearly tempered by the pleasure in expanding the idea of a geometry.
  • The existence of non-measurable sets in set theory with the axiom of choice. (Partly tempered by the Solovay model, a model of set theory without the axiom of choice in which every set is measurable, though I don't know how much working measure theorists care about it.)
  • The independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC set theory, on the existence of a set of intermediate cardinality between the naturals and the reals. Georg Cantor tried to prove it for many years, and it was Hilbert's first problem in his 1900 address. Gödel proved its consistency with ZFC in 1940, and Cohen proved the consistency of its negation in 1963.
  • The Weierstrass function, the first continuous nowhere-differentiable function, got some pretty nasty comments thrown its way
  • Arrow's impossibility theorem that, when there are at least three alternatives, there is no ranked voting system (other than dictatorship!) that satisfies two reasonable-sounding conditions. Informally, every ranked voting system sacrifices some form of "fairness".

Just to collect some of the comments into an answer:

  • Unsolvability of the word problem for groups, that is, there exist groups for which there is no algorithm determining when two elements are equal
  • Unsolvability of the general quintic (and unsolvability of particular quintics such as $x^5-x+1=0$) in terms of radicals
  • To the Pythagoreans, existence of irrationals (in particular, irrationality of $\sqrt2$)
  • Russell's paradox, and in particular, the inconsistency of Frege's set theory
  • Rice's theorem that, roughly, all "interesting" questions about programs are undecidable. (The halting problem, the mother of all undecidable problems, is a special case.)
  • The category $\sf Top$, whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are continuous functions, is not Cartesian closed, in particular it does not have exponential objects. This motivates the search for "nicer" categories of topological spaces
  • Hilbert's tenth problem : there is no algorithm for polynomial Diophantine equations.
  • Noneuclidean geometry. In one way, mathematicians were disappointed by the proof that the parallel postulate did not follow from the other more intuitive axioms. That disappointment was clearly tempered by the pleasure in expanding the idea of a geometry.
  • The existence of non-measurable sets in set theory with the axiom of choice. (Partly tempered by the Solovay model, a model of set theory without the (full) axiom of choice in which every set is measurable, though I don't know how much working measure theorists care about it.)
  • The independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC set theory, on the existence of a set of intermediate cardinality between the naturals and the reals. Georg Cantor tried to prove it for many years, and it was Hilbert's first problem in his 1900 address. Gödel proved its consistency with ZFC in 1940, and Cohen proved the consistency of its negation in 1963.
  • The Weierstrass function, the first continuous nowhere-differentiable function, got some pretty nasty comments thrown its way
  • Arrow's impossibility theorem that, when there are at least three alternatives, there is no ranked voting system (other than dictatorship!) that satisfies two reasonable-sounding conditions. Informally, every ranked voting system sacrifices some form of "fairness".
Technicality, pointed out in a comment
Source Link
Akiva Weinberger
  • 23.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 111

Just to collect some of the comments into an answer:

  • Unsolvability of the word problem for groups, that is, there exist groups for which there is no algorithm determining when two elements are equal
  • Unsolvability of the general quintic (and unsolvability of particular quintics such as $x^5-x+1=0$) in terms of radicals
  • To the Pythagoreans, existence of irrationals (in particular, irrationality of $\sqrt2$)
  • Russell's paradox, and in particular, the inconsistency of Frege's set theory
  • Rice's theorem that, roughly, all "interesting" questions about programs are undecidable. (The halting problem, the mother of all undecidable problems, is a special case.)
  • The category $\sf Top$, whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are continuous functions, is not Cartesian closed, in particular it does not have exponential objects. This motivates the search for "nicer" categories of topological spaces
  • Hilbert's tenth problem : there is no algorithm for polynomial Diophantine equations.
  • Noneuclidean geometry. In one way, mathematicians were disappointed by the proof that the parallel postulate did not follow from the other more intuitive axioms. That disappointment was clearly tempered by the pleasure in expanding the idea of a geometry.
  • The existence of non-measurable sets in set theory with the axiom of choice. (Partly tempered by the Solovay model, a model of set theory without the axiom of choice in which every set is measurable, though I don't know how much working measure theorists care about it.)
  • The independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC set theory, on the existence of a set of intermediate cardinality between the naturals and the reals. Georg Cantor tried to prove it for many years, and it was Hilbert's first problem in his 1900 address. Gödel proved its consistency with ZFC in 1940, and Cohen proved the consistency of its negation in 1963.
  • The Weierstrass function, the first continuous nowhere-differentiable function, got some pretty nasty comments thrown its way
  • Arrow's impossibility theorem that, when there are at least three alternatives, there is no ranked voting system (other than dictatorship!) that satisfies two reasonable-sounding conditions. Informally, every ranked voting system sacrifices some form of "fairness".

Just to collect some of the comments into an answer:

  • Unsolvability of the word problem for groups, that is, there exist groups for which there is no algorithm determining when two elements are equal
  • Unsolvability of the general quintic (and unsolvability of particular quintics such as $x^5-x+1=0$) in terms of radicals
  • To the Pythagoreans, existence of irrationals (in particular, irrationality of $\sqrt2$)
  • Russell's paradox, and in particular, the inconsistency of Frege's set theory
  • Rice's theorem that, roughly, all "interesting" questions about programs are undecidable. (The halting problem, the mother of all undecidable problems, is a special case.)
  • The category $\sf Top$, whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are continuous functions, is not Cartesian closed, in particular it does not have exponential objects. This motivates the search for "nicer" categories of topological spaces
  • Hilbert's tenth problem : there is no algorithm for polynomial Diophantine equations.
  • Noneuclidean geometry. In one way, mathematicians were disappointed by the proof that the parallel postulate did not follow from the other more intuitive axioms. That disappointment was clearly tempered by the pleasure in expanding the idea of a geometry.
  • The existence of non-measurable sets in set theory with the axiom of choice. (Partly tempered by the Solovay model, a model of set theory without the axiom of choice in which every set is measurable, though I don't know how much working measure theorists care about it.)
  • The independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC set theory, on the existence of a set of intermediate cardinality between the naturals and the reals. Georg Cantor tried to prove it for many years, and it was Hilbert's first problem in his 1900 address. Gödel proved its consistency with ZFC in 1940, and Cohen proved the consistency of its negation in 1963.
  • The Weierstrass function, the first continuous nowhere-differentiable function, got some pretty nasty comments thrown its way
  • Arrow's impossibility theorem that, when there are at least three alternatives, there is no ranked voting system (other than dictatorship!) that satisfies two reasonable-sounding conditions. Informally, every voting system sacrifices some form of "fairness".

Just to collect some of the comments into an answer:

  • Unsolvability of the word problem for groups, that is, there exist groups for which there is no algorithm determining when two elements are equal
  • Unsolvability of the general quintic (and unsolvability of particular quintics such as $x^5-x+1=0$) in terms of radicals
  • To the Pythagoreans, existence of irrationals (in particular, irrationality of $\sqrt2$)
  • Russell's paradox, and in particular, the inconsistency of Frege's set theory
  • Rice's theorem that, roughly, all "interesting" questions about programs are undecidable. (The halting problem, the mother of all undecidable problems, is a special case.)
  • The category $\sf Top$, whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are continuous functions, is not Cartesian closed, in particular it does not have exponential objects. This motivates the search for "nicer" categories of topological spaces
  • Hilbert's tenth problem : there is no algorithm for polynomial Diophantine equations.
  • Noneuclidean geometry. In one way, mathematicians were disappointed by the proof that the parallel postulate did not follow from the other more intuitive axioms. That disappointment was clearly tempered by the pleasure in expanding the idea of a geometry.
  • The existence of non-measurable sets in set theory with the axiom of choice. (Partly tempered by the Solovay model, a model of set theory without the axiom of choice in which every set is measurable, though I don't know how much working measure theorists care about it.)
  • The independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC set theory, on the existence of a set of intermediate cardinality between the naturals and the reals. Georg Cantor tried to prove it for many years, and it was Hilbert's first problem in his 1900 address. Gödel proved its consistency with ZFC in 1940, and Cohen proved the consistency of its negation in 1963.
  • The Weierstrass function, the first continuous nowhere-differentiable function, got some pretty nasty comments thrown its way
  • Arrow's impossibility theorem that, when there are at least three alternatives, there is no ranked voting system (other than dictatorship!) that satisfies two reasonable-sounding conditions. Informally, every ranked voting system sacrifices some form of "fairness".
Arrow
Source Link
Akiva Weinberger
  • 23.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 111

Just to collect some of the comments into an answer:

  • unsolvabilityUnsolvability of the word problem for groups, that is, there exist groups for which there is no algorithm determining when two elements are equal
  • unsolvabilityUnsolvability of the general quintic (and unsolvability of particular quintics such as $x^5-x+1=0$) in terms of radicals
  • toTo the Pythagoreans, existence of irrationals (in particular, irrationality of $\sqrt2$)
  • Russell's paradox, and in particular, the inconsistency of Frege's set theory
  • Rice's theorem that, roughly, all "interesting" questions about programs are undecidable. (The halting problem, the mother of all undecidable problems, is a special case.)
  • The category $\sf Top$, whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are continuous functions, is not Cartesian closed, in particular it does not have exponential objects. This motivates the search for "nicer" categories of topological spaces
  • Hilbert's tenth problem : there is no algorithm for polynomial Diophantine equations.
  • Noneuclidean geometry. In one way, mathematicians were disappointed by the proof that the parallel postulate did not follow from the other more intuitive axioms. That disappointment was clearly tempered by the pleasure in expanding the idea of a geometry.
  • The existence of non-measurable sets in set theory with the axiom of choice. (Partly tempered by the Solovay model, a model of set theory without the axiom of choice in which every set is measurable, though I don't know how much working measure theorists care about it.)
  • The independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC set theory, on the existence of a set of intermediate cardinality between the naturals and the reals. Georg Cantor tried to prove it for many years, and it was Hilbert's first problem in his 1900 address. Gödel proved its consistency with ZFC in 1940, and Cohen proved the consistency of its negation in 1963.
  • The Weierstrass function, the first continuous nowhere-differentiable function, got some pretty nasty comments thrown its way
  • Arrow's impossibility theorem that, when there are at least three alternatives, there is no ranked voting system (other than dictatorship!) that satisfies two reasonable-sounding conditions. Informally, every voting system sacrifices some form of "fairness".

Just to collect some of the comments into an answer:

  • unsolvability of the word problem for groups, that is, there exist groups for which there is no algorithm determining when two elements are equal
  • unsolvability of the general quintic (and unsolvability of particular quintics such as $x^5-x+1=0$) in terms of radicals
  • to the Pythagoreans, existence of irrationals (in particular, irrationality of $\sqrt2$)
  • Russell's paradox, and in particular, the inconsistency of Frege's set theory
  • Rice's theorem that, roughly, all "interesting" questions about programs are undecidable. (The halting problem, the mother of all undecidable problems, is a special case.)
  • The category $\sf Top$, whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are continuous functions, is not Cartesian closed, in particular it does not have exponential objects. This motivates the search for "nicer" categories of topological spaces
  • Hilbert's tenth problem : there is no algorithm for polynomial Diophantine equations.
  • Noneuclidean geometry. In one way, mathematicians were disappointed by the proof that the parallel postulate did not follow from the other more intuitive axioms. That disappointment was clearly tempered by the pleasure in expanding the idea of a geometry.
  • The existence of non-measurable sets in set theory with the axiom of choice. (Partly tempered by the Solovay model, a model of set theory without the axiom of choice in which every set is measurable, though I don't know how much working measure theorists care about it.)
  • The independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC set theory, on the existence of a set of intermediate cardinality between the naturals and the reals. Georg Cantor tried to prove it for many years, and it was Hilbert's first problem in his 1900 address. Gödel proved its consistency with ZFC in 1940, and Cohen proved the consistency of its negation in 1963.
  • The Weierstrass function, the first continuous nowhere-differentiable function, got some pretty nasty comments thrown its way

Just to collect some of the comments into an answer:

  • Unsolvability of the word problem for groups, that is, there exist groups for which there is no algorithm determining when two elements are equal
  • Unsolvability of the general quintic (and unsolvability of particular quintics such as $x^5-x+1=0$) in terms of radicals
  • To the Pythagoreans, existence of irrationals (in particular, irrationality of $\sqrt2$)
  • Russell's paradox, and in particular, the inconsistency of Frege's set theory
  • Rice's theorem that, roughly, all "interesting" questions about programs are undecidable. (The halting problem, the mother of all undecidable problems, is a special case.)
  • The category $\sf Top$, whose objects are topological spaces and whose morphisms are continuous functions, is not Cartesian closed, in particular it does not have exponential objects. This motivates the search for "nicer" categories of topological spaces
  • Hilbert's tenth problem : there is no algorithm for polynomial Diophantine equations.
  • Noneuclidean geometry. In one way, mathematicians were disappointed by the proof that the parallel postulate did not follow from the other more intuitive axioms. That disappointment was clearly tempered by the pleasure in expanding the idea of a geometry.
  • The existence of non-measurable sets in set theory with the axiom of choice. (Partly tempered by the Solovay model, a model of set theory without the axiom of choice in which every set is measurable, though I don't know how much working measure theorists care about it.)
  • The independence of the continuum hypothesis from ZFC set theory, on the existence of a set of intermediate cardinality between the naturals and the reals. Georg Cantor tried to prove it for many years, and it was Hilbert's first problem in his 1900 address. Gödel proved its consistency with ZFC in 1940, and Cohen proved the consistency of its negation in 1963.
  • The Weierstrass function, the first continuous nowhere-differentiable function, got some pretty nasty comments thrown its way
  • Arrow's impossibility theorem that, when there are at least three alternatives, there is no ranked voting system (other than dictatorship!) that satisfies two reasonable-sounding conditions. Informally, every voting system sacrifices some form of "fairness".
Spiky boy :)
Source Link
Akiva Weinberger
  • 23.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 111
Loading
added 132 characters in body
Source Link
Akiva Weinberger
  • 23.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 111
Loading
add another example - the wikipedia page has more about expectations of various mathemeticians
Source Link
Akiva Weinberger
  • 23.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 111
Loading
add another example - the wikipedia page has more about expectations of various mathemeticians
Source Link
Loading
added 428 characters in body
Source Link
Akiva Weinberger
  • 23.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 111
Loading
added 163 characters in body
Source Link
Ethan Bolker
  • 97.7k
  • 7
  • 115
  • 205
Loading
added 175 characters in body
Source Link
Akiva Weinberger
  • 23.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 111
Loading
Source Link
Akiva Weinberger
  • 23.5k
  • 1
  • 45
  • 111
Loading
Post Made Community Wiki by Akiva Weinberger