Timeline for Does every infinite summation with real terms converge to a real number?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 7, 2022 at 17:10 | audit | Close votes | |||
May 7, 2022 at 17:11 | |||||
Apr 29, 2022 at 13:01 | audit | Low quality posts | |||
Apr 29, 2022 at 13:08 | |||||
Apr 22, 2022 at 15:14 | comment | added | Michael New | @AlbertWood Fair enough! My implication with "on the number line" was meant to insinuate that it's not represent-able in multiple dimensions in a similar way that $\mathbb{C}$ is homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^2$. I don't have a firm enough grasp of these concepts to phrase it precisely, but by every description the surreals, for example, are "between" the reals, so "on the number line" seemed a reasonable way to hand wave that detail. If you know of a good way to phrase this please let me know. | |
Apr 22, 2022 at 14:44 | vote | accept | Michael New | ||
Apr 20, 2022 at 3:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackMath/status/1516612800570920961 | ||
Apr 20, 2022 at 2:43 | comment | added | Albert Wood | It's worth mentioning there that 'on the number line' is a hazy and ill-defined concept. Most people would think of 'the number line' as being the real numbers, $\mathbb{R}$. The surreal, hyperreal, and complex number systems, to name a few, are number systems containing the real numbers as a subset, but few people would refer to them as 'the number line'. | |
Apr 20, 2022 at 1:50 | answer | added | David P | timeline score: 2 | |
Apr 20, 2022 at 1:43 | history | asked | Michael New | CC BY-SA 4.0 |