Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 3, 2022 at 1:55 history edited Bill Dubuque
edited tags
Jan 2, 2020 at 9:54 comment added Henry related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/517555/…
May 16, 2016 at 13:26 history edited Martin Sleziak
edited tags
Dec 15, 2015 at 16:55 comment added user249332 $a\gt b\gt 2$, does not state everything. If specifically the order with respect to $e$ is said, like $e\gt a\gt b\gt 2$ or $a\gt b\gt e\gt 2$, then it would be more clear.
Dec 15, 2015 at 16:45 answer added S. Wilson timeline score: 0
Apr 7, 2014 at 12:20 vote accept John Marty
Apr 7, 2014 at 12:20 vote accept John Marty
Apr 7, 2014 at 12:20
Jun 4, 2013 at 17:25 answer added awllower timeline score: 1
Jun 4, 2013 at 7:56 comment added user641 If you let $a=b+k$, then you want to solve $(b+k)^b < b^{(b+k)}$, which is equivalent to $(1+\frac{k}{b})^b < b^k$. If you know the definition that $e^k$ is the limit of the increasing sequence $(1+\frac{k}{n})^n$, then this implies $b>e$, or equivalently that $b\ge3$.
Jun 4, 2013 at 4:02 answer added Ivan Loh timeline score: 11
Jun 4, 2013 at 3:24 answer added Shuhao Cao timeline score: 13
Jun 4, 2013 at 3:23 answer added André Nicolas timeline score: 3
Jun 4, 2013 at 3:19 comment added Maesumi what if you took root $1/ab$ from both sides and studied $y=x^{1/x}$.
Jun 4, 2013 at 3:13 history asked John Marty CC BY-SA 3.0