Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 3, 2018 at 23:23 comment added blub Note, that there is even more to be said about the use of variables as there is an intricate relationship, even in the specification alone of the syntax of first order logic, of the object and meta language.
Aug 3, 2018 at 23:22 vote accept Philip D'Souza
Aug 3, 2018 at 23:21 comment added blub Well, under your assumptions that $X,Y$ are predicate symbols, the whole formula becomes rather broken. The main point I wanted to make is that it always depends on the signature and more generally the surroundings on which you built the set of well-formed formulas like the set of variable symbols. Once you've specified these, there is a definite procedure to assert membership.
Aug 3, 2018 at 23:18 comment added Philip D'Souza So really, only (i) is well-formed depending on the assumptions of the signature.
Aug 3, 2018 at 23:13 comment added blub I thought so. But taking these assumptions you can now re-verify your findings.
Aug 3, 2018 at 23:12 comment added Philip D'Souza Wow, comprehensive, thank you. There is no other context given I can assure you. I think it's assumed the lowercase characters are the variables. For (iii) I mistook the U for a disjunction instead of a function.
Aug 3, 2018 at 22:53 comment added blub @DougSpoonwood You are perfectly right I preached firm grounds and you caught me using an abbreviation. Let me add this in. Thank you. This just comes with the length
Aug 3, 2018 at 22:52 history edited blub CC BY-SA 4.0
added 895 characters in body
Aug 3, 2018 at 22:52 comment added Doug Spoonwood If ∈ is a binary predicate, (i) is not well-formed, since we have x ∈ X instead of the well-formed ∈(x, X).
Aug 3, 2018 at 22:33 history answered blub CC BY-SA 4.0