Timeline for Injectivity of $f_r : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ Defined as $f_r(x) = x^3 + rx + 1$: Inflection Points and Injectivity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 29, 2018 at 17:47 | history | edited | Robert Z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 33 characters in body
|
Mar 29, 2018 at 13:47 | vote | accept | The Pointer | ||
Mar 29, 2018 at 13:32 | comment | added | Robert Z | No, $x^2$ is strictly increasing in $(0,+\infty)$ but it has no inflection point. | |
Mar 29, 2018 at 13:30 | history | edited | Robert Z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
Mar 29, 2018 at 13:27 | comment | added | The Pointer | Ahh, ok. So, just to be absolutely sure, I'll repeat my question to Mundron Schmidt: if a function is injective along some interval, must that interval necessarily also include the inflection point? After all, as you say, the inflection point is simply a boundary. | |
Mar 29, 2018 at 13:21 | history | edited | Robert Z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
Mar 29, 2018 at 13:20 | comment | added | Robert Z | Injectivity is not influenced by the appearance of the inflection point! If $f'\geq0$ in $(a,b)$ and $f'=0$ at a finite number of points in $(a,b)$ then $f$ is strictly increasing by the MVT. | |
Mar 29, 2018 at 13:16 | history | edited | Robert Z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 33 characters in body
|
Mar 29, 2018 at 13:15 | comment | added | The Pointer | Thanks for the response, but I was more-so looking for something that directly addresses my 3 points above. Enlightening approach, nonetheless. | |
Mar 29, 2018 at 13:14 | history | answered | Robert Z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |