Skip to main content
16 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 28, 2016 at 4:48 audit Reopen votes
Oct 28, 2016 at 4:49
Oct 23, 2016 at 1:56 answer added Martin Sleziak timeline score: 2
Oct 23, 2016 at 1:19 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 1 character in body
Oct 21, 2016 at 2:37 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
added 893 characters in body
Oct 21, 2016 at 2:29 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
added 207 characters in body; added reference
Oct 21, 2016 at 2:24 comment added Verse yes, i read that paper. any explanation about the upper bound. I can not understand the proof.
Oct 21, 2016 at 2:14 comment added Martin Sleziak Is it the paper Boolean lattices: Ramsey properties and embeddings? arxiv.org/abs/1512.05565 math.kit.edu/iag6/~axenovich/media/poset-15-11-15.pdf dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11083-016-9399-7
Oct 21, 2016 at 2:12 comment added Martin Sleziak Adding an exact reference and link to the paper would be useful, tooo.
Oct 21, 2016 at 1:41 comment added Verse @MartinSleziak I read a paper and i can not understand for the upper bound of this inequality. $Q_n$ is a Boolean lattice of dimension $n$
Oct 21, 2016 at 1:39 history edited Verse CC BY-SA 3.0
added 51 characters in body
Oct 20, 2016 at 14:29 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Oct 20, 2016 at 14:27 comment added Martin Sleziak Simply trying Google lead me to a paper saying that: "...it is a long-standing conjecture of Burr and Erdos that $r(Q_n,Q_n) = O(2^n)$, but the best known bounds (see [10, 17]) are roughly the square of this function."
Oct 20, 2016 at 14:22 comment added Martin Sleziak You should probably add what $Q_n$ is. And perhaps also where the inequality is from. (Is it just your conjecture? Is it exercise from some book?)
Oct 20, 2016 at 14:21 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 3.0
edited tags; more descriptive title
Oct 20, 2016 at 12:50 review First posts
Oct 20, 2016 at 12:52
Oct 20, 2016 at 12:46 history asked Verse CC BY-SA 3.0