Timeline for Lie group of differential operators
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 9, 2020 at 22:01 | vote | accept | Hamada Al | ||
| Jun 9, 2020 at 22:01 | answer | added | Hamada Al | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 28, 2016 at 16:28 | audit | Suggested edits | |||
| Mar 28, 2016 at 17:31 | |||||
| Mar 10, 2016 at 15:46 | comment | added | Paul Sinclair | "Adding $[B,C]$ then It should be compute it's relation with the other operators $A,B,C$" - No. Its relation to the other operators is $[B,C] = BC - CB$. It may turn out that $[B,C]$ is a linear combination of $A, B, C$, but there is no requirement that this has to be. My earlier comment was in response to your last question. There you suggest adding a different operator $D$ to $A, B, C$. But why would you choose that particular operator instead of defining $D = [B, C]$ to be the new add. Then your solution is obvious. | |
| Mar 10, 2016 at 5:43 | comment | added | Hamada Al | Adding $[B,C]$ then It should be compute it's relation with the other operators $A,B,C$ and so the result may be could't written as a linear combination of the operators | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 23:57 | comment | added | Paul Sinclair | If you're going to add an operator, why not just add $[B,C]$? | |
| Mar 9, 2016 at 21:19 | history | asked | Hamada Al | CC BY-SA 3.0 |