Timeline for Is the set of real numbers really uncountably infinite?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 11, 2015 at 1:54 | comment | added | rondo9 | This is a really good question to ask! | |
May 11, 2015 at 1:18 | answer | added | Qiaochu Yuan | timeline score: 4 | |
May 10, 2015 at 20:01 | comment | added | Priyanshu | Thanks Lucian! I understand the issue with the proof now. | |
May 10, 2015 at 19:50 | comment | added | Priyanshu | Thanks Matt. Well I would have appreciated a more mathematical explanation of what exactly is wrong with what I mentioned. I'm totally convinced that the set of rational numbers is countably infinte and that the set of real numbers is not. | |
May 10, 2015 at 19:49 | comment | added | Lucian | each number on the list has a finite length - Not all rationals have finite length. | |
May 10, 2015 at 19:13 | comment | added | Matt Samuel | It's not possible to fix the proof because what you are trying to prove is not true. I promise nobody has been lying to you, the rationals are countably infinite and hence can be written in a list, but the set of reals is uncountable and cannot. | |
May 10, 2015 at 19:06 | comment | added | Priyanshu | Thanks Daniel! Is it possible to address this by explicitly stating that each number on the list has non-zero digits till the $n^{th}$ place beyond which it can simply be appended with zeros i.e. each number on the list has a finite length. Not sure if this would lead to another flaw in the proof. | |
May 10, 2015 at 18:50 | comment | added | Daniel Fischer | You don't know that the number you constructed is rational. | |
May 10, 2015 at 18:49 | history | asked | Priyanshu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |