Background
If an artist releases their artwork under a Creative Commons license, they have the option to permit a user of the work to create derivatives of said work. Assuming the artist uses the minimum CC-BY, the reuser would be permitted to
distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator.
Tracing is a practice where a reuser creates an artwork by manually copying the original artwork or certain features of it (for example, tracing the linework but not the colouring.) One use of tracing that concerns the art community is where a tracing is presented unattributed or as a wholly original work. Because of this, many artists do not wish to have their work traced at all due to fear of having their work plagiarized.
Questions
Creative Commons Licenses
If the source image is released under a Creative Commons license and the person tracing the image adheres to the specific terms of that license, the tracing may be considered legitimate.
Is this statement accurate? Does a CC license enable the tracing of the licensed work?
- Presume that the artist does not wish for their work to be traced. If they accomplished this by using a CC BY-ND, then the reuser is restricted through the No Derivatives term:
If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Would the artist need to restrict the reuser's freedom to build upon the work entirely in order to prevent tracing? If the artist were interested in allowing derivatives but not tracing, would they be able to use a CC license to accomplish this?