-3

Can a person who is now 19 still be charged, if at age 13 they committed rape against a then 11-year-old victim?

Assume that the victim didn’t come forward earlier because the perpetrator threatened to hurt their family if they told.

2
  • I have edited the question so that it is not a request for personal legal advice and just an open ended legal question. Someone more familiar with this area of law in TN than I am may be able to answer it. I am not comfortable that I can do so, even with significant research.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jun 12 at 22:25
  • Understand, thank you. Commented Jun 12 at 22:27

1 Answer 1

3

Sexual activity with a child between 8 and 13 years of age is "child rape" in Tennessee, which is a Class A felony. As far as I can tell from the RAINN chart of statutes of limitation, the limit has not yet expired for this crime that took place 8 years ago - and never will under TCA 40-2-101 q:

  1. A person may be prosecuted, tried, and punished for an offense listed in subdivision (q)(1) at any time after the commission of an offense if:

    a) The victim was under thirteen (13) years of age at the time of the offense[...]

However, since the defendant was a minor at the time of the offense, I think they would be prosecuted in juvenile court. There are some conditions where a juvenile will be prosecuted as an adult, but they mostly apply to juveniles at least 16, or commit certain crimes (including aggravated rape) when younger than this. Some statutory rape charges are mitigated when the age difference between the perpetrator and victim is less than 4 years, although I don't think this applies to rape of a child.

I haven't been able to find any specific consideration for the situation where the defendant was under 16 at the time of the offense and is now at least 18. But it doesn't seem right that they should be prosecuted based on their age at the time the offense is reported, rather than when it took place.

3
  • I am not sure if this is the case in Tennessee, but it is common enough in US-states that the Statute of Limitation for misconduct against children does not even start to run till the victim is 18 or older. As such, a reference to if this is the case there might add to the otherwise welll researched answer.
    – Trish
    Commented Jun 13 at 7:36
  • Found it: TCA 40-2-101 (q)(2): A person may be prosecuted, tried, and punished for an offense listed in subdivision (q)(1) at any time after the commission of an offense if: The victim was under thirteen (13) years of age at the time of the offense
    – Trish
    Commented Jun 13 at 7:46
  • Thanks. But that still doesn't help with the second question of how the defendant would be tried, as a juvenile (as he was when committing the offense) or adult (is he is now).
    – Barmar
    Commented Jun 13 at 23:17

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .