1

If I were to buy a load of old books and rebind them artistically in leather, would I be free to resell them?

2 Answers 2

5

In the U.K., issuing a copy of the work to the public is an exclusive right of the copyright owner (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s. 16(b); s. 18) and so is renting out the work (s. 16(ba); s. 18A). In the U.S., distributing copies of the work by sale is an exclusive right of the copyright owner (17 USC § 106(3)).1

So it is natural for you to ask what you've asked.

However, the first-sale doctrine provides that the exclusive right to sell a particular material instance is exhausted upon the first authorized sale of that instance. From that point forward, anyone may sell that instance. They may even alter its physical form, absent making a copy or derivative of the work. In the U.K., this first-sale concept is codified in the description of what it means to infringe the right to issue a copy to the public (see s. 18, referring to "copies not previously put into circulation").

For one example, from another jurisdiction, of what kind of alterations are not copies, the Supreme Court of Canada has held that physically separating the first layer of a poster and applying it to canvas (resulting in a different texture) was not a reproduction. See Théberge v. Galerie d'Art du Petit Champlain inc., 2002 SCC 34, especially paras. 66-73, where the Court draws comparative support from U.S. law.

There are, however, several ancillary issues that might arise, some of which are covered in Weather Vane's answer, but this answer sticks to copyright. One ancillary issue is "moral rights," a concept from civil law that has found its way into Canadian and U.K. copyright legislation, despite being somewhat distinct. In the U.K., an author has the right to object to "derogatory treatment" of their work (Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s. 80). It is conceivable that a particular re-binding could be considered derogatory treatment, depending on the nature of the original and replacement bindings.


1. Copyright is a bundle of exclusive rights that vary depending on the jurisdiction. In the U.K., there is a list at Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 s. 16. In Canada, see Copyright Act, s. 3. In the U.S., see 17 USC § 106.

5
  • This is an analysis in light of copyright laws. However, there may be trademark issues.
    – user71659
    Commented Jun 2 at 19:40
  • Or public performance issues, or publication issues... Commented Jun 2 at 20:08
  • @user71659 The first-sale doctrine applies to trademark as well. And, a rebound book wouldn't qualify as a public performance.
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jun 3 at 19:36
  • @ohwilleke Not always. Trademark first-sale is subject to materially different and comparable quality control exceptions, which one could run into with a rebound book. They would also have issues if they didn't make it clear that it wasn't a factory binding.
    – user71659
    Commented Jun 3 at 20:05
  • @user71659 So, in this case, issues that could be resolved with a disclosure on the inside front or back cover of the rebound book (which presumably would not have the original publishers trademarks on the exterior of the rebound book).
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jun 3 at 20:53
0

Recovering a book may misrepresent its content, and show the publisher unfavourably. So some books contain a condition of sale similar to:

This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, resold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher's prior consent in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser.

When a book contains that condition, you may not recover it without consent.

If the new cover is a good match to the original, the publisher might have a hard job to justify a complaint; a plain leather binding replaced with a similar plain leather binding, could be called a 'repair'. If the original leather was tooled, gilt, etc., that may contravene the conditions of sale.

If the book is a paperback, then repairing and preserving it with clear self-adhesive fabric may be acceptable.

2
  • 1
    I'm not convinced that a shrink-wrap type purported contractual rule like this one overcomes the first-sale doctrine. It might be invalid as contrary to the public policy expressed in the first sale doctrine and for lack of a sufficient affirmative act of consent to form a contract. Are there any examples of such terms being upheld in court?
    – ohwilleke
    Commented Jun 3 at 19:34
  • @ohwilleke I think he saw one of those things that basically say that buying the book with no cover may mean it is stolen.
    – Tak
    Commented Jun 4 at 3:10

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .