-2

The facts as reported are:

On November 11, 37-year-old teacher Marieha Hussain joined thousands of pro-Palestine protesters in London to call for an end to Israel’s war in Gaza.

During the rally, she raised her placard depicting the faces of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Suella Braverman, the former home secretary, alongside coconuts under a tree on a beach.

Days later, the Metropolitan Police posted a photograph of Hussain and her placard to X on its official account, announcing she was being sought in relation to a hate crime. The post went viral.

She has now been charged with a racially aggravated public order offence and is due in court next month

I think it is not controversial to translate the placard to something like "Marieha Hussain thinks that Sunak and Braverman are working against the interests of our shared community of people of colour and in the interests of the white community".

What would be the elements that would make such a placard a crime?

8
  • 1
    Is this a UK thing? What do coconuts represent? To this American, the image seems like someone enjoying a tropical vacation.
    – Barmar
    Commented May 22 at 16:51
  • @Barmar See Wikipedia.
    – user71659
    Commented May 22 at 17:06
  • 2
    A cocoanut that you buy in the store is black on the outside and white on the inside. It is a well-known (in the UK) and very specific insult typically used by a black person accusing another black person of acting like a white person would and against the interest of other black people.
    – gnasher729
    Commented May 23 at 6:26
  • 1
    A similar but non-racist object is a watermelon to describe a politician as green on the outside but red (I.e. communist)on the inside.
    – Dale M
    Commented May 23 at 13:17
  • 2
    @user71659 But not in the UK. And in the USA, this is about eating watermelons (which I don't get at all, because I like watermelons. And I also like fried chicken). Nobody in the USA would call a black person a "watermelon".
    – gnasher729
    Commented May 24 at 9:12

1 Answer 1

2

The basic offence may be section 5(1)(b) Public Order Act 1986. The offence is committed if the person:

  • "displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening or abusive"

  • "within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby"

The racial aggravation element is at 31(1)(c) Crime and Disorder Act 1998, read in conjunction with section 28(1)(a). "An offence is racially aggravated for the purposes" of section 31 if "at the time of committing the offence, or immediately before or after doing so, the offender demonstrates towards the victim of the offence hostility based on the victim’s membership (or presumed membership) of a racial group".


Racially-aggravated public order offences, section 31 Crime and Disorder Act 1998, specifically 31(1)(c):

(1) A person is guilty of an offence under this section if he commits—

...

(c) an offence under section 5 of that Act (harassment, alarm or distress),

which is racially aggravated for the purposes of this section.

...

(7) For the purposes of subsection (1)(c) above, section 28(1)(a) above shall have effect as if the person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress were the victim of the offence.

See Meaning of “racially aggravated”, section 28 Crime and Disorder Act 1998:

(1) An offence is racially aggravated for the purposes of sections 29 to 32 below if—

(a) at the time of committing the offence, or immediately before or after doing so, the offender demonstrates towards the victim of the offence hostility based on the victim’s membership (or presumed membership) of a racial group; or

(b) the offence is motivated (wholly or partly) by hostility towards members of a racial group based on their membership of that group.

(2) In subsection (1)(a) above—

“membership”, in relation to a racial group, includes association with members of that group;

“presumed” means presumed by the offender.

(3) It is immaterial for the purposes of paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection (1) above whether or not the offender’s hostility is also based, to any extent, on—

(a) the fact or presumption that any person or group of persons belongs to any religious group; or

(b) any other factor not mentioned in that paragraph.

(4) In this section “racial group” means a group of persons defined by reference to race, colour, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins.

"Racially or religiously aggravated section 5 is a summary only, non-imprisonable offence and the maximum penalty is a level 4 fine" (CPS guidance on Racially/Religiously Aggravated Offences) - if it were not racially or religiously aggravated it would be a level 3 fine. At the time of writing, a level 4 fine is up to £2,500 and a level 3 fine is up to £1,000 (Sentencing Council, Maximum fines).

Harassment, alarm or distress, section 5 Public Order Act 1986:

(1) A person is guilty of an offence if he—

(a) uses threatening [F1or abusive] words or behaviour, or disorderly behaviour, or

(b) displays any writing, sign or other visible representation which is threatening or abusive,

within the hearing or sight of a person likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress thereby.

(2) An offence under this section may be committed in a public or a private place, except that no offence is committed where the words or behaviour are used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation is displayed, by a person inside a dwelling and the other person is also inside that or another dwelling.

(3) It is a defence for the accused to prove—

(a) that he had no reason to believe that there was any person within hearing or sight who was likely to be caused harassment, alarm or distress, or

(b) that he was inside a dwelling and had no reason to believe that the words or behaviour used, or the writing, sign or other visible representation displayed, would be heard or seen by a person outside that or any other dwelling, or

(c) that his conduct was reasonable.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .