In the UK, deposits for an Assured-Shorthold Tenancy Agreement (AST) are protected under a Tenancy Deposit Scheme. Which provides protection for tenants and arbitration should there be any disputes.
However, a License Agreement may specify that a deposit is not protected under any kind of tenancy deposit scheme, and also that the licensee is not protected under the housing act of 1988. Therefore, the tenant's deposit is held by the licensor in a 'client account', who gets to dictate the deductions at the end of the license agreement as well as what these cost.
Should there be a situation where there is a dispute in the inventory report/ deposit return. What legal methods/ pathways are available to a tenant who wishes to dispute this and take it to a court if necessary?
I tried the following question but to no avail, because many questions relate to AST agreements and not to license agreements:
- London: how to deal with a landlord not protecting a deposit and not rembursing it? My question is regarding license agreements (this one was), which are not AST agreements and thus not protected under the UK Housing Act of 1985