Timeline for It is legal to distribute a generative AI model where content filtering is completely absent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3 at 20:27 | vote | accept | user56510 | ||
| Jun 3 at 19:59 | answer | added | ohwilleke | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 3 at 19:40 | comment | added | o.m. | @Barmar, consider the recent Schrems complaint against OpenAI (which is admittedly in early stages). Even if copyright does not limit the use of some data, there may be a right to demand a correction. | |
| Jun 3 at 19:33 | comment | added | Barmar | @o.m. Other than copyright, what are the "usual laws" that apply to distributing (as opposed to running) software? | |
| Jun 3 at 19:28 | comment | added | o.m. | @Barmar, actually the usual laws apply to AI -- which can be a serious problem for new technology. | |
| Jun 3 at 17:04 | comment | added | Barmar | I can't imagine any jurisdiction that generally allows free speech outlawying AI's that swear. If humans can swear online, why shouldn't a LLM? | |
| Jun 3 at 17:03 | comment | added | Barmar | There are currently very few laws regarding AI, because it's very new technology and lawmakers haven't had time to figure out what should be legal and write the laws. | |
| Jun 3 at 16:18 | comment | added | User65535 | While it is always difficult to prove something is legal, the existance of huggingface which seems to have hundreds of thousands of models fitting your description I think indicates the answer is at the moment yes. | |
| S Jun 3 at 15:38 | review | First questions | |||
| Jun 3 at 20:33 | |||||
| S Jun 3 at 15:38 | history | asked | user56510 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |