Timeline for It is legal to distribute a generative AI model where content filtering is completely absent?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 5 at 23:55 | comment | added | ohwilleke | @Clockwork-Muse An analysis of the current debate over fair use in the context of AI training can be found in a recent law review article at papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4834410 | |
Jun 5 at 22:59 | comment | added | ohwilleke | @Clockwork-Muse "given that generally it's held that training is inherently fair use" This is not at all a generally held belief and is indeed a hotly debated issue which is the subject of pending litigation. | |
Jun 5 at 22:32 | comment | added | Clockwork-Muse |
The main issues with creating an AI LLM are whether it used copyrighted content in an infringing matter to train it - which is an interesting way to put it given that generally it's held that training is inherently fair use (although this hasn't been fully litigated yet).
|
|
Jun 4 at 3:00 | comment | added | Gray Sheep | Interesting thing would be to create an AI model completely absent from any content filtering (incl. bias of its creators), but having some capability to "think about" the possible biases of all his sources. | |
Jun 3 at 20:27 | vote | accept | user56510 | ||
Jun 3 at 19:59 | history | answered | ohwilleke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |