In the sense of actually copy-pasting individuals' answers and compiling them all into a single post, no. I don't see a point in that. It would be an editing maintenance burden (if anyone wants to keep things in sync), be devoid of any originality, and subvert the voting system for answer posts that are intended to compete with each other.
In the sense of creating a community wiki, and forcing everyone to write their answers in that, that would just be clownery (silliness) (did I just make up a word?). It would generally go against the core design of Stack Exchange. Perhaps in some very very specific circumstances perhaps, but I can't think of any off the top of my head right now.
But if someone takes it upon themselves to compile an answer that is comprehensive and covers ideas that they think are useful from other answers, I think that's fine, as long as they either paraphrase and/or summarize instead of full-verbatim-pasting. See also the rules for referencing material written by others. If that person doesn't add anything of their own to such an answer post, I'd smile upon them for making that post Community Wiki, but I think they'd be in their place not to either, given that they spent the effort to compile useful information (as long as they follow the referencing rules).
I think that can be useful for questions where there are answers that cover different non-overlapping information and go into depth. (see also my answer to "Policy on multiple answers by the same user" and my answer to "What should be the quality standards for list-style questions?").
There's another interpretation of what you're suggesting, which is to compile links to other posts in some sort of "objective / unbiased" sort order.
Stack Exchange isn't really meant for the questions where there are non-overlapping answers that aren't intended to compete with each other at being the "best answer", and each going into depth, but as I've tried to explain in the answer posts I've linked above, I think that could be practical and a "lesser evil" for the purposes of this site in some cases.
Logistically speaking, there are a couple ways to go about this.
If it's just basically a list of links with description text, then you can do it as a table of contents in the question post, and choose some sort of objective sorting order (such as alphabetical, or by creation date / reverse creation date).
You could also make it as an answer post and link to it in the question, but I'd only be happy with this if that answer post is Community Wiki (which itself is a good thing, because then more people can edit it easier.
