Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Security upgrade njwt from 1.2.0 to 2.0.1 #1851

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-3.5.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

cc-prodsec
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


![snyk-top-banner](https://github.com/andygongea/OWASP-Benchmark/assets/818805/c518c423-16fe-447e-b67f-ad5a49b5d123)

Snyk has created this PR to fix 1 vulnerabilities in the npm dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • packages/template-retail-react-app/package.json
  • packages/template-retail-react-app/package-lock.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed with an upgrade:

Issue Score
high severity Prototype Pollution
SNYK-JS-NJWT-6861582
  731  

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Prototype Pollution

…ate-retail-react-app/package-lock.json to reduce vulnerabilities

The following vulnerabilities are fixed with an upgrade:
- https://snyk.io/vuln/SNYK-JS-NJWT-6861582
@cc-prodsec cc-prodsec requested a review from a team as a code owner June 20, 2024 19:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants