All true. This and everything you've posted is solid and interesting. But "interesting" science is not practical science. You've made no argument why anyone should care beyond reasonable, practical behaviors: Don't dramatically over-heat the device and charge it using high-quality, approved charging equipment intended for the device. Allow the device to manage its battery health in accordance to its factory specifications.
The problem with a theoretical, science-forward approach is it gives people like the OP of this thread (and the 6,000 others like them who keep posting variations on the same questions here) zero guidance of applicability. Manually managing a battery to a 99.9% optimal lifespan is unreasonable and laudable only in the abstract. It does not entail behaviors that the average consumer should be expected (or intended, or advised) to pursue. The irony is, when you encourage people to override a self-managing system, you just encourage the actual, applicable science to be ignored in favor of conjecture and unnecessary fear. Trust the device.
You say it yourself: Batteries degrade. That is their natural state. Rather than assuming we can cheat age indefinitely, better that we set reasonable expectations for what the lifespan is and plan for the replacement of the battery or the device on the timeframe that matches that lifespan.
Perhaps the one thing we could agree on, then: All the more reason that any step, no matter how small, that Apple takes toward making it easy and economical to replace batteries in the devices it sells (death to glue!) is vitally important. Both the device and the battery have a lifespan. There is zero reason they need be intertwined.