1

My example is a plate of food that looks like cookies, but are actually savory and tomato-basil flavored. Supposing that it's agreed that calling them "cookies" is incorrect (maybe debatable also), is there a word for incorrectly calling them cookies solely because they look like cookies?

I thought of the word misnomer, which could apply here. But that's just a general term and doesn't take appearance into consideration. I also thought of malapropism, but that's more of a humorous misusage of a word, and doesn't really apply here. I searched this wonderful site and ending up going down the rabbit hole of iconicity, but that's not what I'm looking for.

So I'm wondering if there's a word for calling something the wrong name based on how it looks?

11
  • 2
    Please edit the question to limit it to a specific problem with enough detail to identify an adequate answer.
    – Community Bot
    Commented Apr 18 at 1:46
  • Out of interest the items that Americans call "cookies" are called "biscuits" in British English (the items t
    – BoldBen
    Commented Apr 18 at 3:35
  • May be "misresemblance" as defined in wikitionary.
    – Ubi.B
    Commented Apr 18 at 3:55
  • 1
    'Misrecognize is a verb that means to fail to recognize or identify something or someone correctly. It is derived from the prefix mis- and the verb recognize, and first appeared in the 1960s' (oed.com). So misidentify is a word too, but I would use mistook probably. Commented Apr 18 at 4:34
  • 1
    @BoldBen - Also, British biscuits can be either sweet or savoury. Are cookies sweet by definition? Commented Apr 18 at 8:28

0

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.