The verb "to ellipt" is not found in the SOED (Shorter Oxford Dictionary); neither does Etympnline provide an entry for it. As this verb does in fact figure in the Wiktionary, this means that it is of very recent origin and it might still be contested by some users of English (I have found it myself in a transitive passive usage, but not otherwise).
(Wiktionary) ellipt Back-formation from ellipsis.
Verb
ellipt (third-person singular simple present ellipts, present participle ellipting, simple past and past participle ellipted)
(linguistics) To omit (from an utterance) by ellipsis.
• 2013, Noel Burton-Roberts, Analysing Sentences, page 210:
[…] a couple of further differences between restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses: (1) in contrast with restrictives, the wh-phrase in non-restrictives cannot be ellipted; […]
The example in the Wiktionary entry shows that this verb has a transitive passive usage. It is very much doubtful that it should be a fully transitive verb. That is, sentences as the following would not be very idiomatic, and from my point of view, they do not seem to be quite idiomatic.
Nevertheless, the usage of this verb is seen to have sprung among linguists roughly since the 1990's, the frequency becoming important since the wake of the last century; cases of use before that are relatively rare, thus the existence of no entry in the Oxford dictionary and other sources.
to ellipt
ellipting
use with personal subject pronouns There is no trace, or little trace, of this verb being used with the pronouns.
The term recognized by the SOED is not "elliptic" (term which in the SOED applies only to geometry) but "elliptical", which is also the form retained by Etymonline for the grammatical use.
I'm ellipting this text, so it's ellipted by me right now, after which it will be elliptic
I seems that a phrasing such as the following would be more usual.
- I'm omitting this text, so it's being ellipted right now, after which it will be elliptical.