User:Santhoshreloaded/Survey responses

Thank you for participating in Wikimedian Demographics! This project needs a lot of work, so please lend a hand.

First, please check for "redlink" categories. If there are some, please edit them by adding:

[[Category:Wikimedian Demographics/Response categories]]

If you follow the blue (discuss) links on the userboxes you see below, you will find pages for developing new surveys on the topic in question. If the "discuss" link is a redlink, please add {{subst:Wmdgs-preload/topic}} to create a new discussion page.

Santhoshreloaded in North America

Hello, Santhoshreloaded. This survey asks whether you are a citizen, a resident, or have visited countries in Europe

To answer, use the following key terms after the "=" for each country that applies:

• cr - Citizen and resident
• ncr - Non-citizen resident
• cnr - Citizen, but not a resident
• v - Have visited or previously resided in (but not a citizen)

If you want to answer for a country that does not appear on this template, see Template:Wmdgs-nationality, residence, and travel (Europe) for instructions (a preload template is available, so minimal template experience is required!), and add the country to the template.

Santhoshreloaded in Africa

Santhoshreloaded in Asia

Santhoshreloaded in South America

Santhoshreloaded in Oceania

Hello, Santhoshreloaded, and thanks for your interest in Wikipedia.

This survey currently contain questions about the quality of Wikipedia articles, the notability policy, the number of policies, and Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee, which among other things will be used for the Wikiversity resource on that subject. Other questions will be added to this survey as they become available (you can request or announce new additions here).

Accepted responses to the current questions are as follows:

• Article reliability - In your experience, how reliable are Wikipedia articles? Rate 1-5, with 5 meaning "usually reliable", 1 meaning "usually unreliable", and 3 meaning "reliable about half the time".
• Article depth - In your experience, how deeply do Wikipedia articles address their subjects? Rate 1-5, with 5 meaning "usually deep enough", 1 meaning "usually not deep enough", and 3 meaning "deep enough about half the time".
• Strength of notability requirement - In your experience, how well do Wikipedia's notability requirements work? Rate 1-5, with 5 meaning "too strong", 4 meaning "the right strength, but often interpreted too strongly", 3 meaning "about the right strength", 4 meaning "the right strength, but often interpreted too weakly", 1 meaning "not strong enough".
• Number of policies - In your experience, does Wikipedia have the right number of policies? Rate 1-3, with 3 meaning "too many policies", 2 meaning "the right number of policies", and 1 meaning "not enough policies".
• Rating of ARBCOM - In your experience, how well does Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee work? Rate 1-5, with 5 meaning "fully support", 4 meaning "support, but improvements are needed", 3 meaning "neutral on ARBCOM", 4 meaning "do not support, but would support if improved", 1 meaning "strongly oppose ARBCOM in any form".
• Are you a current or former member of ARBCOM - answer y or n
• Have you ever been an involved party in an ARBCOM case - answer y or n