User:Bellayet/Survey responses
First, please check for "redlink" categories. If there are some, please edit them by adding:
- [[Category:Wikimedian Demographics/Response categories]]
Nationality, residence, and travel
[edit | edit source]To answer, use the following key terms after the "=" for each country that applies:
- cr - Citizen and resident
- ncr - Non-citizen resident
- cnr - Citizen, but not a resident
- v - Have visited or previously resided in (but not a citizen)
If you want to answer for a country that does not appear on this template, see Template:Wmdgs-nationality, residence, and travel (North America) for instructions (a preload template is available, so minimal template experience is required!), and add the country to the template.
To answer, use the following key terms after the "=" for each country that applies:
- cr - Citizen and resident
- ncr - Non-citizen resident
- cnr - Citizen, but not a resident
- v - Have visited or previously resided in (but not a citizen)
If you want to answer for a country that does not appear on this template, see Template:Wmdgs-nationality, residence, and travel (Europe) for instructions (a preload template is available, so minimal template experience is required!), and add the country to the template.
Wikipedia
[edit | edit source]This survey currently contain questions about the quality of Wikipedia articles, the notability policy, the number of policies, and Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee, which among other things will be used for the Wikiversity resource on that subject. Other questions will be added to this survey as they become available (you can request or announce new additions here).
Accepted responses to the current questions are as follows:
- Article reliability - In your experience, how reliable are Wikipedia articles? Rate 1-5, with 5 meaning "usually reliable", 1 meaning "usually unreliable", and 3 meaning "reliable about half the time".
- Article depth - In your experience, how deeply do Wikipedia articles address their subjects? Rate 1-5, with 5 meaning "usually deep enough", 1 meaning "usually not deep enough", and 3 meaning "deep enough about half the time".
- Strength of notability requirement - In your experience, how well do Wikipedia's notability requirements work? Rate 1-5, with 5 meaning "too strong", 4 meaning "the right strength, but often interpreted too strongly", 3 meaning "about the right strength", 4 meaning "the right strength, but often interpreted too weakly", 1 meaning "not strong enough".
- Number of policies - In your experience, does Wikipedia have the right number of policies? Rate 1-3, with 3 meaning "too many policies", 2 meaning "the right number of policies", and 1 meaning "not enough policies".
- Rating of ARBCOM - In your experience, how well does Wikipedia's Arbitration Committee work? Rate 1-5, with 5 meaning "fully support", 4 meaning "support, but improvements are needed", 3 meaning "neutral on ARBCOM", 4 meaning "do not support, but would support if improved", 1 meaning "strongly oppose ARBCOM in any form".
- Are you a current or former member of ARBCOM - answer y or n
- Have you ever been an involved party in an ARBCOM case - answer y or n
Computers
[edit | edit source]- First, please change "Participant (please change to "yes" to enable category)" to read "yes". This will remove the message you are reading now, add this page to the main survey category, and may add a new message about other surveys you can take.
- For the other questions, just answer "y" or "yes" to any operating system you use regularly.
- There are currently only 3 options for this survey. See the template page for instructions about adding new options.
Politics
[edit | edit source]This survey currently contains questions about the primary campaigns.
Other questions will be added to this survey as they become available (you can request or announce new additions here).
Accepted responses to the current questions are as follows:
- Are you eligible to vote in this election? -- Please note that we are interested in the opinions of Wikimedians who are not eligible!
- Answer yes or no (y/n).
- How closely have you been following the campaigns? -- a general question
- 3 = closely ; 2 = somewhat ; 1 = not at all
- Are you a Democrat, Republican, or other? -- Questions about minor party affiliations can be added later.
- D = Democrat ; ID = Independent leaning Democrat ; IO = independent/other ; IR = independent leaning Republican ; R = Republican
- Of the Democratic Party/Republican Party candidates, which do you like the best/think will be nominated?
- Use the last name on the candidates, in ALL CAPS. "#switch:" functions will be added to the template over the next day or so, see the template page for details.
- Has your rating of the Democratic/Republican Party candidates changed since the first time you took this survey? -- opinions sometimes change
- Answer yes or no (y/n)
- How well does the Wikipedia article on the Iowa caucus/US Electoral College explain that process? -- tell us how well Wikipedia is doing! More questions of this type will be added for relevant articles and other Wikimedia resources as time goes on.
- 4 = very informative ; 3 = somewhat informative ; 2 = not informative ; 1 = misleading
- Did the results of the Iowa caucus or the New Hampshire primary affect your potential vote? -- The "pundits" have been very excited about this topic.
- answer yes or no (y/n)
- WMDGS/Primarily contributes to Wikipedia
- WMDGS Participant
- WMDGS/Only reads on Wikibooks
- WMDGS/Regularly contributes to Commons
- WMDGS/Only reads on Wikinews
- WMDGS/Only reads on Wikiquote
- WMDGS/Only reads on Wikiversity
- WMDGS/Only reads on Wikispecies
- WMDGS/Occaisionally contributes to Meta
- WMDGS/Occaisionally contributes to Wiktionary
- WMDGS/Primarily contributes to Wikisource
- WMDGS/Never uses IRC
- WMDGS/Rarely uses Wikimedia mailinglists
- WMDGS/Male
- WMDGS/Wikimedia administrator
- WMDGS/Northeast Earth
- WMDGS/Remind me please
- WMDGS Participant/Wikipedia