Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 October 13

< October 12	October 14 >

October 13

File:KOKH Fox 25 News.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image does not significantly add to the article in any way that might meet the NFCC #8 standards. Largely redundant to File:KOKH-TV Logo.png. Both images probably could be claimed as PD-textlogo, expecially the first one (the background on this makes it a tougher call), but as long as this is marked as unfree, I don't think it meets the requirements for staying. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:36, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is in point of fact a newscast screenshot. While it might not be the latest version given that KOKH has since begun using the modified version of Sinclair's standardized graphics. If you notice, it actually reads "LATE EDITION" in the bottom portion of the logo shown, in reference to the station's 10 p.m. newscast. KOKH generally integrates the titles of their newscasts within the station's logo for news opens, talent bumpers and newscast promos as Sinclair's other Fox stations more than likely do, in place of the usual callsign/city of license ID, so it's not necessarily redundant. TVtonightOKC (talk) 19:53, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tom Pauken headshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that it's actually freely licensed, as opposed to just stuck on the internet. Cannot find the original source either. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:53, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Map of Burma.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused World Factbook map of Myanmar. Nearly identical to File:Burma-CIA WFB Map.png on the Commons. —Bkell (talk) 08:11, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Construction of the Madona Radio Towers in 1932.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not discussed critically. Stefan2 (talk) 12:05, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Preview to Paradise Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive use of non-free files. There is already another image: File:Cody Simpson - Paradise.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 12:12, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: "Two" is not excessive; alterate album artwork is not forbidden on the English Wikipedia.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:NFCC#3a: more than one image is excessive if just one image gives the same result. See WP:NFC#UUI §2: discographies are not allowed to contain images, but the infoboxes seem to be an attempt to create a discography with the different covers for this product. Also, books, games, films and software don't get multiple cover images. Exactly why do you think that music albums are different? When listening to music, you usually don't even see the cover images, and so they are typically irrelevant to the identification of the music: you identify the music by how it sounds, not by how music products are marketed. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Katy Perry Teenage Dream The Complete Confection.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excessive use of non-free files. There is already another image: File:Teenage Dream album cover.png Stefan2 (talk) 12:13, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: "Two" is not excessive; alterate album artwork is not forbidden on the English Wikipedia.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:NFCC#3a: more than one image is excessive if just one image gives the same result. See WP:NFC#UUI §2: discographies are not allowed to contain images, but the infoboxes seem to be an attempt to create a discography with the different covers for this product. Also, books, games, films and software don't get multiple cover images. Exactly why do you think that music albums are different? When listening to music, you usually don't even see the cover images, and so they are typically irrelevant to the identification of the music: you identify the music by how it sounds, not by how music products are marketed. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deluxe cover of Nicki Minaj's Pink Friday Roman Reloaded.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. There is already a different cover: File:Nicki Minaj Pink Friday Roman Reloaded cover.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 12:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: "Three" is not excessive; alterate album artwork is not forbidden on the English Wikipedia.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:NFCC#3a: more than one image is excessive if just one image gives the same result. See WP:NFC#UUI §2: discographies are not allowed to contain images, but the infoboxes seem to be an attempt to create a discography with the different covers for this product. Also, books, games, films and software don't get multiple cover images. Exactly why do you think that music albums are different? When listening to music, you usually don't even see the cover images, and so they are typically irrelevant to the identification of the music: you identify the music by how it sounds, not by how music products are marketed. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PFRRTheReUp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3a. There is already a different cover: File:Nicki Minaj Pink Friday Roman Reloaded cover.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 12:25, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: "Three" is not excessive; alterate album artwork is not forbidden on the English Wikipedia.—Ryulong (琉竜) 15:53, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- See WP:NFCC#3a: more than one image is excessive if just one image gives the same result. See WP:NFC#UUI §2: discographies are not allowed to contain images, but the infoboxes seem to be an attempt to create a discography with the different covers for this product. Also, books, games, films and software don't get multiple cover images. Exactly why do you think that music albums are different? When listening to music, you usually don't even see the cover images, and so they are typically irrelevant to the identification of the music: you identify the music by how it sounds, not by how music products are marketed. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NeumannTriangle.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced by SVG: File:NeumannTriangle.svg Stefan2 (talk) 13:10, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hermann Balck.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Old version by User:MisterBee1966: fair use claimed.

Current version by User:Bolekpolivka: {{PD-HHOFFMANN}} claimed, but there is no evidence that this photo was seized or even that it was taken by Heinrich Hoffmann in the first place.

Fair use doesn't apply since there is a freely licensed image on Commons: Commons:File:Hermann Balck.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Structure.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two files in one. Neither seems to be useful. The current one is also unsourced and unlicensed. Stefan2 (talk) 14:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Salt overly generic name -- 70.24.247.66 (talk) 04:47, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Petah-Tikva city hall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Crop from better image on Commons: File:Petah-Tikva city hall.jpg. No use for this cropped version. Stefan2 (talk) 14:41, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:22px-Flag of South Korea.svg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useless: File:Flag of South Korea.svg is better. Not eligible for F8 since the file format is different. Stefan2 (talk) 16:38, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Can somebody undelete this? Any page with South Korea's flagicon is now distorted such as: 2012 Summer Olympics medal table Timmyshin (talk) 01:57, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It has not been deleted. The flag in the list works for me and is not the same as the one in the nomination. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:39, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The flag doesn't load on my Firefox 16.0.1 browser. Although it did load in IE. Which one are you using? Timmyshin (talk) 00:09, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tried four browsers: Firefox, Seamonkey, Opera and Chromium. It worked in all of them. --Stefan2 (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well I'm not technology savvy to know what my browser's problem is, but I'm sure what I'm experiencing, there are others out there experiencing it too. It took me a lot of Googling to get to this page. And I'm sure it's related to this page, since the problem never happened before October 13. Right now in place of the Korean flag it's just displaying the linked text "South Korea".Timmyshin (talk) 04:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The South Korean flag is missing for me, too, on Chrome. The issue seems to be coming from the fact that the following file (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/09/Flag_of_South_Korea.svg/22px-Flag_of_South_Korea.svg.png) is for whatever reason missing.

Also, concerning the reason why Stefan2 tagged the file for deletion, keep in mind that the purposes of the .svg file and the 22px-flag .png files are different. The latter is intended for in-line use next to text, and from what I can tell, there's a 22px .png version of every national flag for said purpose. I think this mark for deletion should be taken down. Unbal3 (talk) 06:37, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lets clear up a bit of confusion: When you browse to File:Flag of South Korea.svg , the description page opens. The file is stored as SVG, but browser support for SVG is spotty, thus the image is rendered as PNG. When wikimarkup is used to place the image with a size, such as 22, then it is rendered as a PNG at that size, using the http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia... URL. The 22px chunk is the requested size. You can directly call a certain size by changing that chunk:

For some reason, the image is not being rendered at 22px. Let me look at this. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 10:03, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I personally see the 22px image

but this problem has been reported in many places, for example Template talk:Country data South Korea#Display, Template talk:FlagIOCathlete#Edit request on 16 October 2012 and bugzilla:40980. PrimeHunter (talk) 12:19, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yesterday, it showed as a gray bar, now it appears properly for me. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 12:22, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Figure 2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. No foreseeable use. Images like this shouldn't use JPG anyway. Stefan2 (talk) 18:16, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MALANJKHAND.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, out-of-focus picture of some lights at night. No context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 18:45, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Soulnotes Production Logo OtQRCGhASrT9..jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, apparently self-created logo for an apparently non-notable production group. Tagged {{Cc-by-2.5}}, but the description contains a lot of supposed restrictions on this license ("The Logo should not be modified its design," "The Logo should not be used as another function or purpose…"); these restrictions are incompatible with the claimed Creative Commons license. —Bkell (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DANIEL-KOJTA-STUDIO-TRAIL-l.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, apparently self-promotional image. No encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 18:59, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:StaticStability.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 19:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iphone5logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. File:IPhone5Title.svg is better. Stefan2 (talk) 21:23, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tommy february6 Halloween Addiction Cover.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not discussed critically. There's already a different cover: File:Tommy heavenly6 Halloween Addiction Cover.png. This additional one fails both WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 21:28, 13 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Map-Lazistan.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Propaganda 87.123.118.75 (talk) 05:23, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues aside, is this not just a map of Lazistan ? - Jarry1250 ^{[Deliberation needed]} 10:36, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It says "Source: Cumali von Molla Ahmed". Compare with File:IEA-flag.png which is instead marked with "Source: Mullah Muhammad Omar". The uploader can be at most one of the named people, unclear who. This may mean that other files by the uploader also have to be deleted. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:40, 19 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.