Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/User/Archive/February 2009

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Note: if the discussion that you are looking for is from this month, but is not on this page, it may still be at WP:UCFD.

February 28

[edit]

Category:User Iran's PEACEFUL Nuclear Energy

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 02:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:User Iran's PEACEFUL Nuclear Energy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Looks like some sort of individual user category, which have unanimous precedent to delete. VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Waray-Waray Wikipedians

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Merge Category:Waray-Waray Wikipedians to Category:User war-N - jc37 02:17, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Update: The single member was already in the target category. This category was populated by Template:User wikiwaray, which is about contributing to the Waray-Waray language Wikipedia. Cleaning up categories in that userbox. - jc37 02:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Waray-Waray Wikipedians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Category description is "Users who are native speakers of the Waray-Waray language." - Improper naming convention for a babel category. VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians who attend the Vasile Goldiş West University of Arad

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Vasile Goldiş West University of Arad--Aervanath (talk) 13:51, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians who attend the Vasile Goldiş West University of Arad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Improper naming convention of "who attend". Needs to be renamed to the standard convention of Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Vasile Goldiş West University of Arad. VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians against popularity contests

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 02:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians against popularity contests (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Support/oppose category, which have an extensive precedent for deletion. See Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/Topical_index#Wikipedians_who_support.2Foppose. VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Users that play the Cruce card game

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 02:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Users that play the Cruce card game (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Improper naming convention of "users", also knowing who plays a particular card game does not benefit the encyclopedia to categorize. VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Users from New Zealand

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Wikipedians from New Zealand--Aervanath (talk) 13:49, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Users from New Zealand (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Improper naming convention of "users". Category should be renamed to Category:Wikipedians from New Zealand, or deleted as knowing where someone is from is not particularly encylopedically beneficial (most location categories are "Wikipedians in" categories, which IMO should be the standard convention). VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User:Cooljuno411/life archive

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete, and notifying User:Cooljuno411. - jc37 02:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Cooljuno411/life archive (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Apparently some sort of individual user category, which have unanimous precedent to delete. VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians in the Zips

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete--Aervanath (talk) 13:31, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians in the Zips (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Apparently "the Zips" refers to Szepes County. Category needs to be renamed accordingly to match article name per standard naming conventions. VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Users who love getting friendly notices

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 01:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Users who love getting friendly notices (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

"Who love" is an unexcyclopedic naming convention. Categorizing this also has no real encyclopedic benefit. VegaDark (talk) 04:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


February 27

[edit]

Category:Wikipedians who watch The Money Channel

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - jc37 01:48, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians who watch The Money Channel (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This new category is not useful for encyclopedic collaboration. Watching a particular TV channel does not imply any special ability, knowledge, or interest. --Stepheng3 (talk) 19:40, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


February 25

[edit]

Category:WikiProject League of Copyeditors participants

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete--Aervanath (talk) 13:21, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:WikiProject League of Copyeditors participants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Category:WikiProject League of Copyeditors (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Defunct wiki-project, has been tagged as such for many months, should be deleted. MBisanz talk 20:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

February 20

[edit]

Category:Wikipedians who listen to video game music

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep--Aervanath (talk) 13:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians who listen to video game music (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Far too broad to foster any sort of collaboration. "Video game music", according to our article, is "any of the musical pieces or soundtracks found in video games." With the vast array of video games, this list of video game music would likely span almost every musical genre and would encompass millions of different tracks. Furthermore, we could just as easily rename this category to "Wikipedians who have ever played a video game not on mute, or are not deaf", because virtually everyone who has ever played a video game has listened to video game music. Overall, not a useful category to seek out others for collaboration. VegaDark (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Black Falcon (Talk) 07:20, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Calicut Wikipedians

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Wikipedians in Kozhikode--Aervanath (talk) 13:04, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Calicut Wikipedians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Calicut redirects to Kozhikode, which is a city. Needs a rename to conform with "Wikipedians by location" categories. VegaDark (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Black Falcon (Talk) 07:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Calvinist and Reformed Wikipedians

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Calvinist Wikipedians--Aervanath (talk) 13:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Calvinist and Reformed Wikipedians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems to be a duplicate of Category:Calvinist Wikipedians. Needs a merge one way or the other if so. VegaDark (talk) 19:38, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Black Falcon (Talk) 07:02, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Wikipedians interested in the history of countries

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Wikipedians by interest in the history of a country--Aervanath (talk) 12:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians interested in the history of countries (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Should be renamed to better clarify this is a parent category. VegaDark (talk) 00:25, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Black Falcon (Talk) 06:43, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User-specific Welcome templates

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy rename. While I normally wouldn't close a nomination that I had initiated, this is an uncontroversial speedy nomination that has been unopposed for more than 10 days. –Black Falcon (Talk) 21:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:User-specific Welcome templates to Category:User-specific welcome templates
Nominator's rationale: To fix capitalization. –Black Falcon (Talk) 20:06, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.


February 4

[edit]

Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Theodore Roosevelt High School (Kent, Ohio)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. –Black Falcon (Talk) 05:56, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Wikipedians by alma mater: Theodore Roosevelt High School (Kent, Ohio) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

High school alma mater category, which have an extensive history of deletion. VegaDark (talk) 00:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:User lzh-0

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. –Black Falcon (Talk) 05:57, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:User lzh-0 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

0-level category, which have been unanimously deleted per Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion/Archive/Topical_index#Wikipedians_by_0-level_language_knowledge. VegaDark (talk) 00:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

February 2

[edit]

Category:EJXG supporters

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. –Black Falcon (Talk) 06:31, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Category:EJXG supporters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Described as a list of Élton José Xavier Gomes supporters, it currently contains one user page. Gomes is a football (soccer) player. A user category based on support for a sports personality seems excessively narrow and unlikely to promote collaboration. --Stepheng3 (talk) 22:55, 2 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete as a "Wikipedians by individual" category, which have all been deleted. Additionally uses improper naming conventions as having no indication it is a Wikipedian category. VegaDark (talk) 00:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.