Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The Silmarillion#Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age. The subject is already summarized in the target section, but if there is additional material that editors believe should be merged there, the history is available. RL0919 (talk) 22:46, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One short chapter from a Tolkien work. We don't often have articles about specific chapters of works unless the chapters themselves gain significant independent coverage outside of the main work itself, like The Scouring of the Shire or Leviticus 18. This chapter does not garner that sort of attention. Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 20:01, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge a small amount of information into The Silmarillion#Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age Three of the other four parts of The Silmarillion redirect to the main article on the book. I see no reason why this one should be given the privilege of having its own article, as there does not appear to be any substantial discussion of this portion of the book. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 20:37, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:07, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to The Silmarillion. Very few books merit articles about their chapters, and no, Tolkien works do not qualify. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:11, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per nom and age-old prophesy: One Nominator to find them all and in the Afd merge them, in the land of Wikipedia where the articles lie. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:34, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is even less notable than the rest of the Samirillion which is truly saying a lot.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:49, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What?! There's a new book about Sam Gamgee? Clarityfiend (talk) 10:09, 19 December 2019 (UTC) [reply]

Redirect to The Silmarillion#Of the Rings of Power and the Third Age, per Susmuffin. Goustien (talk) 06:58, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.