Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kmetija
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:46, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Kmetija (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article does not establish notability of topic. Lacks sources FiachraByrne (talk) 12:10, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Slovenia-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:01, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There would seem to be plenty of reliable sources here. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:55, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I went through the Google search results posted above and found two items in English, which I've added to the article. I don't speak Slovene and was unable to evaluate the remaining hits. The article now contains two presumably reliable sources which are independent of the subject — but since both sources are from the Slovenian Press Agency (STA), they aren't independent of each other, so at least one more source (from somewhere else) needs to be found in order to satisfy the letter of the notability requirement of multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject and of one another. Richwales (talk · contribs) 22:23, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 06:04, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.