Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abbey Fleck

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jafeluv (talk) 10:44, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abbey Fleck

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notable only for one event. Ridernyc (talk) 02:59, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The nominator's argument would be a good one if a review of the reliable sources showed that she was discussed only in the weeks or months following her invention. However, Google Books search shows significant coverage in reliable sources, namely books about young inventors, for at least fifteen years after she invented her unique cooking device. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:19, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Yeah, notable for one event - she was written about in books for years after the invention was created.SL93 (talk) 21:51, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:49, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Notability of the topic is established. See [1] and [2]. Northamerica1000 (talk) 02:49, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Agreed, it looks like there is notability per the sources above. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 19:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.