Jump to content

User talk:Aspireforintelligence

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Aspireforintelligence! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SweetCanadianMullet 17:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Aspireforintelligence, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Aspireforintelligence! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Greatness of the Sword, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Greatness of the Sword

[edit]

Hello, Aspireforintelligence. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Greatness of the Sword".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 00:01, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The First Teacher (novel) moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, The First Teacher (novel), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:01, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Thank you. This article was translated by me from Russian Wikipedia. Yes, I am working on finding reliable sources for the article.Aspireforintelligence (talk) 13:31, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Aspireforintelligence. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aspireforintelligence. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Aspireforintelligence|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.

  • You recently added a photograph of the Steve Lott to his article and listed the photo as own work. What is your relationship with Steve Lott? If you have been hired to write/work on this or any other Wikipedia article the Terms of Use require the disclosures noted in the template and, recently, that you provide links to any sites where you advertise. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Jbh Talk 01:52, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Thank you for showing an interest to my work. I must state that I do not get any kind of a financial benefit, nor direct or indirect compensation for editing and writing articles. I write different articles which is easy to verify by my input. I have asked a journalist I know, who recently was in the Boxing Hall of Fame to take a photo of Steve Lott for me.Aspireforintelligence (talk) 13:25, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your prompt response. Our copyright policy requires that the actual author provide copyright release. It is not acceptable for you to upload another's work as 'own work'. You can have the photographer send release information to info-en-c@wikimedia.org. More information can be found at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. Jbh Talk 16:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See the deletion nomination over on Commons. Jbh Talk 16:39, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unless you have explicitly obtained the rights to the photo and have a release from the photographer transfering their copyright to you in toto the release needs to come from the photographer. If the work has been released by the photographer under a compatible license elsewhere then documenting that is also acceptable. WP:COPYOTHERS] has more information on that. Jbh Talk 15:20, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Non-compromised Pendulum

[edit]

Hello Aspireforintelligence,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Non-compromised Pendulum for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 22:19, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aspirations

[edit]

At the risk of being accused of "outing" you, I will state that you have contacted me by telephone and told me who you are. You undoubtedly have a CoI and, despite your claim above, I consider that your activities here almost certainly count as paid editing which you have not properly declared.

I have moved your article back to draft space. Please wait for it to be properly reviewed. Do not copy it back to mainspace. But the best advice I can give you is to trot out my usual mantra: kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks the book is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:32, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your English is very good but you need to learn the difference between cite, sight and site. I agree that with Katagans for example it is difficult to see how you might have any CoI. But when I see your name and mug shot on a site associated with the Non-compromised Pendulum, I say that is prima facie evidence of CoI. The best advice I can give you is this or put in a request at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Boxing. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:38, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I found your choice of PRhese as a possible "sponsor" rather curious. He seems to be more concerned with general quality control rather than specifically boxing topics. Instead, look at the main section of category:boxing books. It lists six books. Three of them were created in 2003/2004 by the same person. He is still active. Try asking him for help! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Non-compromised Pendulum (October 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Velella was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 Velella  Velella Talk   16:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Aspireforintelligence. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Aspireforintelligence. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]