Template talk:Famine in India

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Disaster management This template is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles India This template is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

Backdoor deletion by redirecting it is not ok. That is against Wiki rules. AFD can be used instead. Crashed greek (talk) 12:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted too Crashed greek. The portrayal of these famines in drama belongs in this template and there isn't a suitable reason to remove Deccan famine of 1630–1632. LearnIndology (talk) 16:07, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Both the initial edits and the revert seem in good faith, just differing template-arrangement concepts. In my experience templates usually contain media about a topic if available, either in a few entries if there aren't too many or in overall links such as Statue of Liberty in popular culture while also linking prominent examples. I don't know if this is a part of a guideline or not, but makes sense so readers interested in the principal topic can learn more about how it has impacted overall society. Randy Kryn (talk) 21:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I feel the same way Randy Kryn, which is why I restored the Media section. Nice to see you here, LearnIndology (talk) 04:17, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]