Jump to content

Talk:Wandsworth

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

question

[edit]

So where if the "dodgy end" of wandsworth? should it be mentioned? 38.124.250.218 (talk) 18:59, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion between borough and area

[edit]

I think there are quite a few parts of this article that confuse the borough of Wandsworth with the small town of Wandsworth. For example, I recall the Evening Standard listed the whole borough (including the Battersea and Putney) when it listed it as third in the country for £1m+ property sales. I rather doubt there is that much £1m+ property in the area I would call Wandsworth, the Tonsleys may be expensive, but they are not that expensive. Of course, establishing this is made much harder because there are no citations. Can anyone add citations for some of these?Gaffertape (talk) 16:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For this reason I am deleting the reference to the new US embassy. This is planned for the Nine Elms area, which is in the Borough - but miles from the town of wandsworth.--Wickifrank (talk) 02:17, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weird emphasis

[edit]

Was this article written by an estate agent? The breathless references to property values... the famous residents... the references to "excellent views across the Thames". —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.23.61.208 (talk) 09:51, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

There might be an argument for changing this to Wandsworth Town under common usage. [1] [2] MRSC (talk) 13:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wandsworth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 16 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]