Talk:Patterson power cell

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Patterson power cell article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 29 November 2011, see discussion. Keep, 12 May 2007, see discussion.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Energy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The setup was to demonstrate 1000 times more energy out than in. There is no doubt that no transmutation products have been detected, but that doesn't say anything about the heat production. The line of reasoning that the experiment was inconclusive therefore no heat was produced is not correct. It is less accurate than we need to be. 84.106.9.95 (talk) 10:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have reliable independent replication published in a peer reviewed paper (or reliable independent tests on the device) to make claims that it had 1000 times more energy output than input. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:44, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I added a link to the Earthtech study of transmutation products. It contains a reference to a heat measurement report which is available from Earthtech upon request. Earthtech are known for good laboratory technique, even though this report is unpublished.

173.197.66.40 (talk) 18:52, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've bothered to select a few relevant examples of Pattersons many patents. Those patents are reliable sources of the existence of those patents. Why have they been removed?

84.106.9.95 (talk) 10:34, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Patents are primary sources. Patents have no associated due weight. Significant mentions should be made in reliable secondary sources to establish due weight. IRWolfie- (talk) 10:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Patterson power cell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111014221603/http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Patterson.shtml to http://www.newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Patterson.shtml
• Added archive https://archive.is/20120714111519/http://link.aip.org/link/?APCPCS/1103/450/1 to http://link.aip.org/link/?APCPCS%2F1103%2F450%2F1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]