Jump to content

Talk:Kristin M. Davis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Proposed deletion removal

[edit]

I removed the proposed deletion tag from this article because I believe that this article is not suitable for PROD. 1) Davis's claim to fame was being the center of a high-profile prostitution ring, not in politics; hence, we would not be following politician guidelines (alone) for this person. 2) There are many other sources available. --J. Myrle Fuller (talk) 19:14, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Tisane (talk) 20:39, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Which begs the question, why is she called "so-and-so (politician)"? I mean, she hasn't actually been a politician yet, has she, she's only campaigned for office. Since her "claim to fame" isn't politics, shouldn't she be listed as something else?
Wiktionary:Politician reflects that an officeseeker can be considered a politician. Tisane (talk) 06:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

YouTube video

[edit]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JtiuwCKLRQ8 Tisane (talk) 05:03, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why didn't she show up at the LP convention?

[edit]

Did she "refuse" to appear for a particular reason? Tisane (talk) 19:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admitted she can't win?

[edit]

In regards to this edit, it sounds more like she's saying it's a long shot that she'll win, and predicting that Cuomo will win. Which is a bit different from saying she can't win. If one assumes the system isn't rigged and that the voters are intelligent, rational, well-informed individuals motivated primarily by a desire to further the public interest, then there is no reason she can't win. Tisane talk/stalk 17:38, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is her Political Career Now Over?

[edit]

This page just got moved by somebody who says "Her Political career is now over".

According to AP she got 22,801 votes for Governor of New York in an election held just two days ago.

I do not think her political career is over. I think it is just starting. This page should be moved back to where it was. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kayokimura (talkcontribs) 18:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are FBI people allowed to do drug dealings?

[edit]
According to prosecutors, Kristin Davis bought ecstasy, Adderall and Xanax pills from an FBI cooperating witness at least once a month from 2009 through 2011, paying hundreds of dollars for each purchase and allegedly providing these drugs to guests at her house parties. Based on information provided by this witness, the FBI set up the aforementioned sting operation, during which Kristin sold pills to the witness, whom she believed to be a drug dealer. The deals were recorded both on video and on audiotape; according to court papers, the FBI plant wore a wire.

Since the FBI is obvously running drug dealings in the USA, I'm asking myself: Why doesn't the FBI dealer need to go to prison?? Because this guy obviously earned millions from the dealings...probably even with "confiscated" stuff! So it's all about confiscating drugs and then reselling. The American parliament needs to do some law revisions to prohibit these kind of dealings. Otherwise it's just racketeering people, that has nothing to do with the law. But anyway, it was J. Edgar Hoover who built a mafia out of the FBI anyway. As a result, the USA is nothing better than Russia...it just looks different. The "one party" of Russia versus the secret mafia of the States. Well done, "congratulations", to create a mafia state out of the USA, increasingly racketeering people instead of leaving them alone. Are Americans really proud of that? I doubt it...but I'm not an American, though. --178.197.225.219 (talk) 13:18, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kristin M. Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:03, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Kristin M. Davis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]