Jump to content

Talk:Bob Day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Political Donations

[edit]

To keep it in context this subject should follow the Federal election paragraphs not Land use regulation and Industrial relations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maryogden (talkcontribs) 23:40, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean, but please feel free to rearrange the sections logically. Donama (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Left wing bias in article

[edit]

I refer to this quote: "getting to the 14.3 percent quota from 19 group voting ticket party preferences: Australian Independents Party, Australian Stable Population Party, Liberal Democratic Party, Smokers Rights Party, No Carbon Tax Climate Sceptics, Building Australia Party, Rise Up Australia Party, Katter's Australian Party, One Nation, Australian Fishing and Lifestyle Party, Australian Christians, Shooters and Fishers, Australian Motoring Enthusiast Party, Democratic Labor Party, Animal Justice Party, Australian Greens, Palmer United Party, HEMP Party, Australian Labor Party"

There seems to be a left wing bias. For instance, when the Greens first entered Parliament, there was no talk of how they used smaller minor parties, and an enlisting of all the different party preferences they used, to enter parliament.

I think the notion that is trying to be pushed is quite evident: Bob Day would not have been voted in, if he didn't have the support of these micro parties. This is an encyclopaedia, not a politicking tool. 129.180.137.107 (talk) 12:04, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Bob Day. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Question? A help request is open: yes. Replace the reason with "helped" to mark as answered.

I have manually changed the failed archive-url to an earlier date, https://web.archive.org/web/20100923205519/http://vtr.aec.gov.au/SenateStateFirstPrefsByGroup-15508-SA.htm Not sure how to correct the bot date, so have left the help request open. Find bruce (talk) 03:44, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:15, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quote attributed to Bob Day

[edit]

Specific quote from article inserted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bell20 (talkcontribs) 06:43, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bell20 (talk · contribs) has twice sought to include a quote attributed to Bob Day. Edit 1 was reverted by Timeshift9 (talk · contribs) with the comment "removed added quote, not in the paragraph reference." Edit 2 had a comment which referred to the article "Bob Day accused of 'sham contracting' before building business went belly up"., which is basically the same article in a different Fairfax publication and was reverted by me.

This article is about a living person and must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, which requires the quote to be properly sourced. The difficulty is not the quote, but rather the absence of proper sourcing. -- Find bruce (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]