Jump to content

Talk:Advantage Business Marketing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 19 June 2018

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Not moved. There is no support for the proposed move at this time. bd2412 T 02:49, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advantage Business MediaAdvantage Business Marketing – Organizational name change LJawor (talk) 15:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)--Relisting. Dekimasuよ! 16:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Thank you for disclosing your connection. Wikipedia titles do not necessarily coincide with official names, unless they are also the name in common use in reliable, independent sources. You wrote that the press release was written by a third party, but the linked page says "news provided by Advantage Business Marketing". (Press releases are mentioned briefly at WP:NEWSORG as examples of sources that may not be treated as independent depending upon the circumstances.) Do other reliable sources call the company "Advantage Business Marketing"? If not, this is not an indication that the page will never be moved to the new title, but that Wikipedia is likely to wait for coverage in outside sources to reflect the new name before changing anything here. Dekimasuよ! 01:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • For the time being, I have created the proposed title as a redirect to the current article. Dekimasuよ! 01:25, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your assistance Dekimasu - for now we'll just be patient until third-party coverage can assist. Appreciate your help so much! LJawor (talk) 15:24, 25 June 2018 (UTC)LJawor[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Citations review

[edit]

This is a space to review the quality and appropriateness of the citations used in the article. Though I effectively created and am the most prolific editor on this article, I do see it is of borderline notability when looking at its citations. Please feel free to comment so that we can get to a good consensus on the citation list utility and appropriateness. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 02:24, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Caption
Short Cite Source Source type Comment Utility
silverman2010 Morris County Daily Record local newspaper Most of the article is an interview Q&A; only the preamble before the interview was used as source material. Notability support
Bonsera 2009 Morris County Daily Record local newspaper Used as a source for a firm descriptor; firm is an incidental mention here Info add
briefcase2006 Daily Record local newspaper mention of a product re-launch acquired as part of firm birthing Info add
rondon2014 Folio trade magazine Appears to be not a completely press release driven piece, though it starts with reference to such a release, with some synthesis and analysis Notability support
callahan2011 Advertising Age trade magazine
tcomweek2012 Telecommunications Weekly trade magazine
circmag2008 Circulation Managment trade magazine
collins2014 Mergers & Acquisitions trade magazine
mickey2010 Audience Development trade magazine
DDD2015MediaKit Drug Discovery & Development trade magazine
entcloseup2017 Entertainment Close-up trade magazine
Marketing PRNewsWire press release

Summary

[edit]
  • Supportive of Notability: Rondon 2014, Silverman2010

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 01:18, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]