Jump to content

Talk:1969 People's Park protest

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Feedback from New Page Review process

[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good day! Thank you for creating this article. I hope and encourage you to make more articles! Have a blessed day!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking for "the public"

[edit]

At two points in this article, the authors offer the opinion of "the public" as if it were an easily defined and described entity. That's not really good form.

We see: "He had received popular support for his 1966 gubernatorial campaign promise to crack down on what the public perceived as a generally lax attitude at California's public universities."

What does "public perceived" mean here? Did UC Berkeley have a lax attitude or not? That's a matter of opinion. It's a weak trick to claim that the public agreed with one's opinion and that, moreover, this wasn't just an opinion but a "perception." (Yes, I appreciate that it's now common to use the word 'perceive' to blur the line between observation and opinion, but it's a bad practice regardless.)

The second point is similarly weak. We are expected to measure support for Reagan's action based on reporting of telegrams he received? That's hardly careful polling. A consideration of the details of the article cited show the problem: Reagan received 101 telegrams, of which 98 supported him while 3 didn't. Are we supposed to believe that Reagan's support for this controversial decision was at 98%? The extreme nature of this percentage shows the absurdity of using it as a reflection of anything.

Telegram communication was trending down many decades before 1969. By then, most people preferred using the telephone, even for long-distance communication. So, who was still using telegrams in 1969? It's fair to conclude a subset that's hardly representative of the public at large. RickDesper (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point on the first one - neither of the cited sources attribute that view to the "public." I changed the wording to be more in line with what the sources say. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 21:33, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the second point, that is a claim that the cited source makes. From the Desert Sun: "A sampling of Gov. Ronald Reagan’s telegram basket showed today Californians support his defense of armed force in handling the People’s Park demonstrations by a 33-to-l margin." Besides, the wording in the article already makes it pretty clear this is a sampling, not a complete representation of the public: "a small sampling of public input (101 telegrams received by the governor's office after the broadcast) suggests that the public was supportive of the governor's actions." PhotogenicScientist (talk) 21:37, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]