User contributions for 109.79.172.238

9 September 2020

• 01:2001:20, 9 September 2020 diff hist +284‎ User talk:MarnetteD ‎ Doesn't have to be a long comment. Agree or Disagree. Shouldn't take much longer than the time you took too delete the talkback notice.
• 01:0501:05, 9 September 2020 diff hist +185‎ Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series) ‎ Quote the most relevant part of article directly in the reference.
• 01:0001:00, 9 September 2020 diff hist +1,416‎ The Vengeance Trilogy ‎ I agree it shouldn't be in the lede, but I think this is worth keeping. Move down into "Home media" section.
• 00:5200:52, 9 September 2020 diff hist +1,276‎ Battlestar Galactica (miniseries) ‎ Reviews from critics, Variety, New York Times, AV Club.
• 00:4700:47, 9 September 2020 diff hist +341‎ Battlestar Galactica (miniseries) ‎ →‎Reception: Start reception section as was suggested on Talk page.
• 00:4400:44, 9 September 2020 diff hist +387‎ Talk:Battlestar Galactica (miniseries) ‎ →‎Reception section?
• 00:3800:38, 9 September 2020 diff hist +251‎ Battlestar Galactica (miniseries) ‎ Improve reference, add details.
• 00:2500:25, 9 September 2020 diff hist +50‎ Hancock (film) ‎ Fix minor table layout error, my bad.
• 00:2200:22, 9 September 2020 diff hist −16‎ Hancock (film) ‎ Reflist columns are automatic, hardcoded value no longer necessary.
• 00:2100:21, 9 September 2020 diff hist −25‎ Hancock (film) ‎ Template:Portal "there is no need to create a new section just to house this template" move to External links section.
• 00:1900:19, 9 September 2020 diff hist +1‎ Hancock (film) ‎ Template:Good article "This template should be placed at the bottom of the article before defaultsort, categories and interwikis."
• 00:1900:19, 9 September 2020 diff hist −306‎ Hancock (film) ‎ WP:MOSFILM Accolades. Column names for the table are typically Award, Category, Recipients, and Result. Replace Outcome with Result. Also reduce the excessive table decorations, and use + header row.
• 00:0200:02, 9 September 2020 diff hist +533‎ Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film ‎ →‎Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic in Reception sections

8 September 2020

• 23:5323:53, 8 September 2020 diff hist +39‎ User talk:MarnetteD ‎ Please reply.
• 23:4823:48, 8 September 2020 diff hist +733‎ Talk:Reign Over Me ‎ CinemaScore is acceptable, IMDB is not
• 23:4523:45, 8 September 2020 diff hist +86‎ Talk:Reign Over Me ‎ Edit Diff
• 23:4123:41, 8 September 2020 diff hist −139‎ Talk:Reign Over Me ‎ →‎Cinemascore: Cleanup.
• 23:4023:40, 8 September 2020 diff hist +1,125‎ Talk:Reign Over Me ‎ →‎Cinemascore: CinemaScore and PostTrak are not WP:USERGENERATED web polls which are clearly disallowed.
• 23:2923:29, 8 September 2020 diff hist +1,153‎ Talk:Reign Over Me ‎ →‎Cinemascore: new section
• 22:4022:40, 8 September 2020 diff hist +410‎ Reign Over Me ‎ Huh? No, CinemaScore is a professional company that survey's audiences during the opening weekend of a film. See also WP:MOSFILM Undid revision 977296020 Tag: Undo
• 22:3022:30, 8 September 2020 diff hist +612‎ Talk:Demolition Man (film) ‎ →‎Image caption.
• 22:1822:18, 8 September 2020 diff hist +970‎ Talk:Demolition Man (film) ‎ →‎Image caption.: new section
• 21:4921:49, 8 September 2020 diff hist −112‎ Demolition Man (film) ‎ Revert unexplained change. I didn't want to add a caption just for the sake of having a caption. If you can't do better than a generic claim of praise without any references then don't add a caption. Undid revision 977417728 by 183.83.154.105 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 15:2715:27, 8 September 2020 diff hist +30‎ Talk:Spider-Man: Far From Home ‎ →‎Navboxes
• 15:2415:24, 8 September 2020 diff hist +1,693‎ Talk:Spider-Man: Far From Home ‎ →‎Navboxes
• 14:5214:52, 8 September 2020 diff hist +166‎ Spider-Man: Far From Home ‎ Review says "the well-cast but under-utilized Zendaya" not Gyllenhaal (maybe the text was vandalized?) But that's not important. Don't bury the lead, he was disappointed enough to call it a failure compared to other Spider-Man films.
• 14:2914:29, 8 September 2020 diff hist +7‎ Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series) ‎ MOS:CURLY fix previous edit to better comply with the style guidelines.
• 14:2714:27, 8 September 2020 diff hist +485‎ Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series) ‎ Better reference, link to the actual interview instead of Joss Whedon page which is only a link and fan comments. (Also it is not clear it should be included at all since Whedon was only referring to the '''mini-series'''.)
• 14:0514:05, 8 September 2020 diff hist +17‎ Battlestar Galactica (2004 TV series) ‎ Tidy infobox. Copyedit. Remains controversial ... " to this day" which day? Leave it out. WP:RELTIME.
• 13:5313:53, 8 September 2020 diff hist +1‎ List of awards and nominations received by Battlestar Galactica ‎ Tidy
• 13:5213:52, 8 September 2020 diff hist +1,785‎ Gaius Baltar ‎ Article should include more examples of critics praising the character (that's why he's notable enough to have his own article after all).
• 12:3212:32, 8 September 2020 diff hist −156‎ Flash Thompson ‎ This wording might have made sense when it was written but it is all unnecessary detail after Spider-Man Far From Home
• 12:0912:09, 8 September 2020 diff hist −39‎ Transformers: The Last Knight ‎ Don't add to the intro without first adding the necessary information to the article body. WP:FILMLEDE Which "certain characters" are you talking about and why isn't there anything in the Critical response section about it either? Undid revision 977127596 by 75.144.26.38 (talk) Tag: Undo
• 11:5611:56, 8 September 2020 diff hist +97‎ RoboCop (franchise) ‎ Copyedit. Brevity.
• 11:4811:48, 8 September 2020 diff hist +7‎ Transformers: War for Cybertron Trilogy ‎ Rotten Tomatoes 100% (15 reviews)
• 11:4211:42, 8 September 2020 diff hist +776‎ Now You See Me (film series) ‎ Expand Infobox. See WP:INFOBOXPURPOSE
• 11:3611:36, 8 September 2020 diff hist −267‎ Now You See Me (film) ‎ Remove references. IMDB not a reliable source and WP:CASTLIST does not need references, the film itself is the source. Tag: references removed
• 11:3411:34, 8 September 2020 diff hist −33‎ Now You See Me (film) ‎ Do not presume, do not speculate, say what you see.
• 11:3211:32, 8 September 2020 diff hist +274‎ Now You See Me (film) ‎ Update Rotten Tomatoes. Criticism of the twist ending never should have been added without sources, Citations needed (or deletion).
• 11:2311:23, 8 September 2020 diff hist −125‎ Now You See Me 2 ‎ Let the scores speak for themselves (34% is on the low end of mixed). Table to prose, WP:PROSE is better than a short table, and it is only three nominations from a single organisation.
• 11:1811:18, 8 September 2020 diff hist +26‎ Now You See Me (film series) ‎ Template:Portal_bar Please note that the documentation of this template specifically says it does not belong in the "See also" section.
• 11:1611:16, 8 September 2020 diff hist +162‎ Now You See Me (film series) ‎ Infobox remove MOS:SMALLFONT. Rephrase misleading wording, Critic reviews were mixed (50%) and negative (33%). Cinemascore reviews and box office gross indicate general audiences were more positive.
• 11:0711:07, 8 September 2020 diff hist +1,380‎ Grudge Match ‎ Variety. Hollywood Reporter. Rolling Stone.
• 10:5810:58, 8 September 2020 diff hist +92‎ Grudge Match ‎ Update. Improve Cinemascore reference.
• 10:5010:50, 8 September 2020 diff hist +139‎ User talk:Ronhjones ‎ →‎Grudge Match
• 10:4810:48, 8 September 2020 diff hist +113‎ Daphne Zuniga ‎ Deadly Assistant. Finish previous edit, submitted incomplete edit by mistake.