Category talk:Mario (franchise)

This category was nominated for renaming on 20 June 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

This category is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

IGN Convention (3 participants)
Vector Unit (2 participants)
Anton Rayne (9 participants)
Id Tech 2 (disambiguation) (4 participants)
Jeffrey Ventrella (4 participants)
Darkworks (3 participants)
Ayeah Games (2 participants; relisted)
Keemokazi (2 participants; relisted)
Batboat (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Proposed renaming

Moved from WP:CFDS

– – Fayenatic London 11:26, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Category:Mario to Category:Mario (franchise) – C2D: per Mario (franchise). Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:59, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Category:Mario Universe games to Category:Mario (franchise) games
- Category:Mario characters to Category:Mario (franchise) characters
- Category:Mario enemies to Category:Mario (franchise) enemies
- Category:Mario media to Category:Mario (franchise) media
- Category:Works based on Mario to Category:Works based on Mario (franchise)
- Category:Animated series based on Mario to Category:Animated series based on Mario (franchise)
- Category:Unofficial works based on Mario to Category:Unofficial works based on Mario (franchise)
  - Please open a CFD and notify WPVG. I think "Mario franchise" might turn out preferable. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 15:37, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Armbrust: I'm treating this as formally opposed. – Fayenatic London 00:28, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It is long! Editor-1 (talk) 03:48, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.