User talk:ЗAНИA

• Archive 1 (Oct 2006 - Jul 2007)
• Archive 2 (Aug 2008 - Nov 2013)
• Archive 3 (Feb-May 2014)

When I'm active I'm very active but I often take long wiki breaks. Check my activity here before you post a comment

Hey ЗAНИA, like I answered on my talk page I am sorry, I had no idea. I am new to wikibooks. Plus, I did not mean to publish, I thought it was all in my user pages. Sorry! Do you now, where on the Mediawiki wikis it is reasonable to publish a novel? Thanks for the info and the work you do here. Jergas (discuss • contribs) 23:01, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

BTW, I noticed you corrected my redlink so it will stay in my user namespace. Thank you for that, it was another doubt I had. Is it ok with policy if I write practice stuff under my user namespace? Jergas (discuss • contribs) 23:19, 17 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

There are no Wikimedia wikis dedicated to novels. A private, American company, Fiction Wikia (I am unable to provide the link because our spam blacklist keeps blocking it!) seem to offer novels though. User pages can be used to practice writing stuff but shouldn't be used as a personal website for a holding site for content that isn't appropriate for Wikibooks.--ЗAНИA ^talk 11:21, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Uh.... Indonesian Wikibooks is allowing everyone to wrote their fiction writing as long as they are original stories and the author is willing to release their work under CC BY-SA. They even held a fiction-writing wiki-a-thon with the main prize as high as equivalent USS$1000+ , they even will print their work as the icing on the cake. Of course, fan-fiction is forbidden because they're using copyrighted materials and should be written in Fiction Wikia. Dunno about other Wikibooks tho. Veracious (discuss • contribs) 09:27, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I have posted the following message in my site : https://sites.google.com/site/facultiesindiafoundation/home

The author has provided the same contents in https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Listen_and_Learn_Science

--DManohar (discuss • contribs) 06:53, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello how are you Lucien roubens (discuss • contribs) 16:14, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speaking of MediaWiki:Edittools, I noticed in an edit summary by you from last year that you mentioned the loading of the edit bar had become slow in Opera and other browsers lately. Has the edit bar continued to be slow to load since then? Was English Wikibooks the only project where you have experienced this slow down? I noticed based on the timing of the comment that I might have caused it with an addition to the advanced section of the edit bar, and I made some changes today that should reduce that problem. --darklama 18:08, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Well, I was going to reply with a yes, it's still slow but typing this reply I see that the edit bar loads straight away. Not sure if I had this problem on other projects as 95% of my editing is on Wikibooks with the remainder on en.wiki, en.voyage and it.wiki/voyage. Opera is generally extremely fast although with a few sites it totally struggles - Facebook in particular. Everything seems fine now though - thanks!--ЗAНИA ^talk 18:22, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Xania,

Also, Dark, Quite & Pi

Would you be able to assist me with something, or rather help me understand the following:

Action complete

Revision of abc successfully flagged. (view reviewed versions)

You may want to view this flagged version and see if it is now the stable version of this page.

Return to Special:UnreviewedPages.

Return to Special:PendingChanges.

I am getting this message for quite sometime now, however not for all the reviews I do.

Do you have any idea, what this might be? I am not sure of this, so...

Danke Schôn. Vishal Bakhai - Works 15:11, 27 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

happens to me sometimes too. Usually when the page hasnt loaded fully before I click Review. Xania

I created this template today for use on a user's discussion page, should the likely need to advice people to use categories come up again. Wikibooks has had for a long time {{uncategorized}} for use on books and pages as well. The "this template" part changes to reflect the namespace the template is used in. --darklama 13:32, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

It's been my impression a category meant to be subst'd should include in its expansion an html comment identifying the template, so there's evidence left behind of the template use. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 16:38, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I can see how anyone trying to track down a template problem can benefit from an identifying comment. My impression has been that Wikibooks has little to no consistency for template design. From the templates I have seen on Wikibooks, my guess is half of Wikibooks' substituted templates do include an identifying comment and the other half do not. I have also seen templates that do not mention substitution and get updated without substitution in mind, cause problems for people who were substituting it. Maybe all templates should include an identifying comment. --darklama 17:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

This template should be very useful. I regularly patrol new pages and add categories to them and when I see such new pages from the same users I try to point out the use of categories to them (but not all the time). No idea about Pi Zero's comment - not even sure what you are talking about!--ЗAНИA ^talk 18:49, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

The markup for Template:Unsigned looks like this:

<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[w:Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|discuss]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]) {{{2|}}}</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

That template is designed to be subst'd. And every time it is subst'd, that html comment at the end, <!-- Template:Unsigned -->, is part of what gets substituted in on the target page. So you could, in principle, do a string search across the whole wiki for that html comment, and thereby find all of the places where the template has been used. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 19:03, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Darklama, I noticed you'd made some changes to Wikibooks:Templates which include things like → talk page → signature in many places on the page. What does that mean? I understand that we should also include our signatures but page? Also I recently created Template:Editsummary but since noticed that it's been moved to Edit summary and the wording has also been changed. I created that with the intention of using it for people who remove lots of text. There exist other templates with names like fixit, testfriendly and so on so it seems that there's no requirement for separate words although I agree that there needs to be much more consistency.--ЗAНИA ^talk 19:10, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

→ talk page → signature refers to two optional template parameters. Some templates optionally can link to the page where a person made an edit. I've been trying to reflect changes made to templates listed from Wikibooks:Templates, which had not previously been documented in the examples there. I saw you clarify on someone's discussion page that the intention was to mean a large removal. I was trying to update the template to reflect that as well as the fact Wikipedia has a similar template named {{w:edit summary}}. In more general terms any major edit should use the edit summary, not just removals of a lot of text. --darklama 19:27, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Also I kept the redirect the correct name you used was with a capital "S": Template:EditSummary. --darklama 19:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I know that many of the templates take different parameters but I didn't think that was what the → talk page stuff was about. I'm not sure if it's clear. My first thought was that it was suggesting that after using the template we should then mention a page (i.e. below the template) and finally sign. Regarding the edit summary template - I wasn't aware that redirects would work for templates. That's useful to know, thanks.--ЗAНИA ^talk 19:48, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I saw someone else had already used the format to mention optional parameters and I decided to do the same as a short term solution to the fact that most of these templates are poorly documented. --darklama 20:00, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I saw you blocked "temporarily" (i.e. indefinitely...) a user because you didn't know how one user can create another. You can go to Special:UserLogin/signup to create a new account. I don't understand the block. Examples. PiRSquared17 (discuss • contribs) 21:02, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

The block was simply because I had no idea what was going on. It was indefinite for that reason. It was a precaution. I guess I thought it was some kind of strange spammer action. Don't see how non-established users have the ability to create so many accounts at the click of a button. The block has been undone now.--ЗAНИA ^talk 21:16, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

There is an account creation throttle set in the server configuration. It is currently 6 within a 24 hour period assuming the user doesn't IP address hop (you can see the configuration here, search for 'wgAccountCreationThrottle' to see the setting). The functionality is described on MediaWiki Wiki. On en.wikibooks, Administrators are not affected by the limitation as they have noratelimit as a right. I have occasionally had to create a block of accounts for a school who have hit the rate limit. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 07:46, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Useful to know. Hadn't seen such actions before and it just seemed weird. It seems odd that a new user, with no edits on the other wikis I checked, would know how to create extra accounts. --ЗAНИA ^talk 10:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Is there a way to stop people from editing just one heading in the page, but allowing them to edit other heading on a page? CallumPoole (discuss • contribs) 22:45, 30 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I don't think I understand what you are asking. The only way to stop people editing a page (or a section of a page) is if the page is protected but that is only done for pages which are very frequently vandalised.--ЗAНИA ^talk 09:52, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Xania,

Help again.

I just saw a "Editor" group person delete a page. How is that an editor can do it? As in I am curious, since, I am not sure if I have that right or not?!

Here at the deletion log, I can see Special:Log/delete, that Savh deleted this:

• 23:30, 31 May 2014 Savh (discuss | contribs) deleted page A Helping Hand With Methods Of Acupuncture (Spam, vandalism, or nonsense)

The user has the following rights:

• Savh (discuss | contribs)‏‎ (Reviewer) (Created on 24 September 2010 at 22:23)

Do I also have this rights, as I come under the same tag:

• Harrybrowne1986 (discuss | contribs)‏‎ (Reviewer) (Created on 18 February 2011 at 17:23)

Sorry, if I sound a bit lame in asking this, but I am not sure of this.

Danke Schôn. Vishal Bakhai - Works 18:17, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

I just investigated a little and notice that he/she is a Steward so can block and delete on almost every wiki (with some exceptions like en.wikipedia). I think it would be useful if Stewards left some kind of message in their Edit Summary so others know who they are (or at least mention in on their local user page). --ЗAНИA ^talk 18:52, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Oh! Thanks for that. I see now on other wiki's too about him/her. Can you tell me something else please. I have been thinking of getting to the next level(which would be ?), and I know I am saying this too early(only as per the edits), but, it is like this, that I am trying to do good out of everything I do, and seeing that yes there are quite a number of admins active, I would still wish to get to that post. When do you think I can nominate myself for that, and be able to assist more. Also, thanks for helping me with my queries, always. :) Danke Schôn. Vishal Bakhai - Works 19:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

You can read about administrators at Wikibooks:Administrators but the information about requirements is quite vague. I think the community look for consistency, a need for the tools (you need to clearly explain why you need the tools and what you will do with them) as well as presence on the project for several months.--ЗAНИA ^talk 09:34, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

From what I have seen your biggest area to work on is creating substantive content (as opposed to vandal fighting) that will demonstrate both an understanding of the Wikibooks project and an ability to communicate well in written English. Administrators need to judge the quality and value of contributions (e.g., in deletion discussions) and explain their reasons when challenged over deletions, blocks, etc. To do this you need to be able to clearly articulate yourself to native English speakers and those with less developed skills. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 10:39, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ahh. I see what you mean Quite. Well in that case, I see myself working on anyway the German book, and also have been doing my part as a reviewer too. I will try and be at the standards required for the same. Till than Danke Schôn mate. Cheers. Vishal Bakhai - Works 17:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Maybe this should have:

#firstHeading { text-align:center; color:blue; }

Any new pages added in the future would then automatically have this styling. Also means future changes only requires updating one page. --darklama 22:16, 31 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

You can also test out any changes you make in your own per book user subpage first at /per book/Wikijunior:Europe.css. --darklama 23:48, 1 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that. There are no more pages to be added to the book (unless Europe gains a new country like Scotland or Catalunya) but this seems a simpler method although I used auto wiki browser so at least it wasn't time consuming. Are codes like that listed anywhere on Wikibooks or did you just know it because of previous CSS knowledge?--ЗAНИA ^talk 23:36, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I was able to apply previous CSS knowledge by examining the HTML source code for a specific page. I do not know whether specific identifiers are documented anywhere at Wikibooks. I think the MediaWiki website or English Wikipedia might documented specific identifiers. You can read Cascading Style Sheets to learn how to style elements in general. --darklama 00:33, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ah, the source code. I'm good at examining that when trying to download video from a site but didn't think about analyzing it for this kind of thing.--ЗAНИA ^talk 09:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sorry about the stray pages I made Xania, I accidentally made the links unattached from the main book, I'll make sure to get new pages attached to the book ASAP, as for the other ones you can just delete them. And again, sorry bout that, my mistake. --MasterSkrat (discuss • contribs) 02:26, 2 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ciao! Scusa se scrivo in italiano, ma così posso spiegare il mio progetto con scioltezza.
Se sei interessato a tradurre il dizionario io te ne sarei veramente grato, ma come ho detto al Bar di en.wb non è importante tradurre i lemmi ma è importante che la mia idea venga portata avanti su wikibooks in inglese, perché penso che su quello in italiano non avrà un futuro così bello come potrebbe averlo qui.
L'unica pagina che penso sia utile da tradurre è quella principale perché contiene le idee che stanno alla base del libro; il resto può essere scritto dagli stessi utenti di Wikibooks in inglese. Io potrei darti una mano nella sua traduzione (per quello che riesco a fare: io capisco l'inglese ma non lo so scrivere bene) ma con le mie abilità posso solo continuare quello che ho già iniziato su it.wb. --Riccardo Rovinetti (discuss • contribs) 16:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ciao! Non e' un problema - anche io capisco l'italiano ma non lo scrivere bene! Si, la idea venga portata su wikibooks inglese ma e' necessario tradurre solo la paggina principale. La parole divulgative non si usa in inglese puoi devo pensarae un nome differente. Fammi pensare!--ЗAНИA ^talk 19:51, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Una parole meglio e' instructive o educational.--ЗAНИA ^talk 19:53, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Grazie infinite per l'interessamento! Fammi sapere se ci sono novità o se ti serve aiuto! Thank you so much again!!! (P.S. Do you think it would be better if we used our native language to write? We'll be sure to write what we really want to say). --Riccardo Rovinetti (discuss • contribs) 20:45, 3 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

The OCR A-Level Physics book would be much better as a sub-book of the A-level Physics book rather than being its own book. The Overall book has subheadings that I have created and some extras that were already there. i moved the book to this new name ti make room for an overall portal to different examination boards and not just OCR. When I moved the book some of the subheadings got left behind as i was unaware that only the page would move and not the entire book. Most of the page that are under A-level Physics are apart of the OCR book but the ones that aren't are the ones under the subpage of Edexcel. I would like to request administrative assistance in moving this book. Also, the AQA board also has its own book, AQA A-Level Physics. This would also be better for the book layout if the book was a sub book of the portal page, A-level Physics. Thank you -- Template:Benjamin.doe.signature 12:21, 07 June 2014 (UTC)

I think I understand what you're after but can you tell me exactly which pages need moving and to where? It definitely seems better to have just one book rather than duplicating so much information and having to update things every time an exam board changes their syllabus.--ЗAНИA ^talk 18:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

There is an OCR book and an AQA book. They should be out under their own subheading as AQA and OCR. Edexcel is already a sub book. There are also extra page in the actual "a-level physics" book. The ones that aren't filed under Edexcel and are directly in the book should be under OCR. It's really hard to explain so I'm sorry if you got confused. Thank you -- Template:Benjamin.doe.signature 18:01, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

I wonder if you could provide an answer to my question raised on the following page Talk:Handbook of Management Scales/Alliance performance. Preferably there. 87.51.169.180 (discuss) 06:32, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have just replied for this same query, as requested by the IP USer on my talk page.

I reverted in Good Faith Edit, as Test Edit, and have stated the same to the user. I see that you had added a comment to the IP Page for Sandbox edit request.

Danke Schôn. Vishal Bakhai - Works 06:55, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Replied on the talk page. Sorry for the late response.--ЗAНИA ^talk 18:30, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is User:Xania confirming requests to usurp accounts at these Wikis.--ЗAНИA ^talk 23:03, 6 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi! If you have no contributions to ro.wikipedia, you can just register with your username without further notice.

If you wish to reply, please do it on my ro.wikipedia page here. Thanks. --Wintereu (discuss • contribs) 00:31, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Tried that but someone else has my username. That's the problem. I have left a message on your ro.talk page.--ЗAНИA ^talk 11:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I see. Well, in that case, you just need to specify in the usurp request the new name that you wish to use.

After that, within a couple of days, an administrator will handle it. Thanks for notice. --Wintereu (discuss • contribs) 12:35, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

By the way, you also need to give a valid reason (due to protocol), which in your case is this: a user account (Xania) already exist, but it's not mine.

--Wintereu (discuss • contribs) 12:43, 7 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

• Links to requests:

1. Castilian Wikipedia Done
2. German Wikipedia Done
3. Finnish Wikipedia Not done (refusing to action, apparently against their policies)
4. Portuguese Wikipedia (waiting)
5. Romanian Wikipedia Done
6. Original Meta requests

--ЗAНИA ^talk 18:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I saw your request. You forgot to specify the new name you want to use. --Wintereu (discuss • contribs) 19:35, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is the name I want to use. Someone else has my name on ro.wikipedia. I want to take control of that username.--ЗAНИA ^talk 20:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I'm afraid there's no legal way you can do this. Still, you could try to send an e-mail to that user (Xania). --Wintereu (discuss • contribs) 21:16, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Romanian Wikipedia doesn't allow usurping of usernames? Every other project seems to. Why not? Anybody know why projects can create their own rules about these things? Is this mentioned anywhere on Meta and what's the point?--ЗAНИA ^talk 21:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Now I am thinking that I might have caused confusion. My username is Xania (the link says ЗAНИA but the username is actually Xania). All I am asking is to take control of the local Xania username on ro.wikipedia because at the moment someone else has my username on that wikipedia. That user has never made any edits. I hope that helps.--ЗAНИA ^talk 21:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Afaik that's a pretty routine 'crat action. I've done it as an en.wn 'crat. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 22:36, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

When the SUL finalisation is completed (promised for months, so who knows when it will actually happen), you will automatically gain control of your username on all projects. Who gets a username when there is a conflict follows a priority list - with functionaries coming first, followed by edit counts. As you are a CheckUser and sysop here, and those operating the other Xania accounts are not, then you will take ownership of Xania everywhere. The previous owner gets force renamed - e.g., to Xania_rowiki. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 09:19, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

First, a bureaucrat must review the request. Yours is still pending. It's not a refusal. --Wintereu (discuss • contribs) 16:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Saying that there's no legal way to do it seemed like a refusal.--ЗAНИA ^talk 19:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, ro.wp has only three 'crats and just two of them actually use their rights. If both of them are unavailable during the same period of time, noone will handle the requests. Sorry for the delay. Firilacroco (discuss • contribs) 12:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Xania. I'm one of the bureaucrats at ro.wiki and I saw your request today (sorry for the delay). Our policy says that we must announce the current user about the usurpation and mandates a 7 day waiting period for him/her to respond. After that, we will perform the usurpation. If seven days have passed and I forget, please give me a nudge. Thanks for your patience, Razvan Socol (discuss • contribs) 19:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

The usurpation at ro.wiki is now completed. Razvan Socol (discuss • contribs) 04:10, 9 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I just wanted to explain about Lingwa de planeta wikibook. Lingwa de planeta (Lidepla for short) is rather a young conlang, but it seems rather notable. There is an "Alice in Wonderland" translation published in it, and even some Esperanto-authors treat it as a "modern Esperanto". By now I've put only the reference grammar here, to the wikibooks, but I'm going to translate big good manual (it's published in Russian wikibooks now.) --Sunnynai (discuss • contribs) 09:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I have also had a look and seen many resources around. The existence of an Alice in Wonderland translation is also important. I am removing the Query tag now although I suggest making the book a bit more book-like with pages, etc. As there is already a Russian version of this book it would be nice to link to it (if you haven't already done so) - Wikijunior:Europe has little templates at the bottom of its front page linking to German and Romanian translations of the book.--ЗAНИA ^talk 10:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

OK, thank you! I didn't succeed in making the template link, by I added the simple link to the Russian wikibook. Also, is it possible to add Lingwa de planeta to the constructed languages list? --Sunnynai (discuss • contribs) 15:25, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I added {{subjects}} and {{status}} tags to the book's main page, and {{BookCat}} to its subpages. Or I tried to, anyway. So now it's listed on Subject:Constructed languages. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 16:06, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot! Now this page can be deleted - I've made a copy with English title. --Sunnynai (discuss • contribs) 17:51, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Done --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 18:18, 10 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

I am very slowly gaining more knowledge. I hope someone else with more knowledge than I comes along. Pittsburgh Poet (discuss • contribs) 19:36, 28 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

So on a wikibook they did a small piece of 'vandalism' as seen here. I've reverted their changes. I just thought I'd tell you, as I don't know how you deal with them. Do you block their IP or what ever? Their IP: 49.144.196.228. CallumPoole (discuss • contribs) 14:32, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Blocking is only used for persistent vandalism, usually after a warning, or where the edits are clearly some kind of semi-automated spamming. Unless there is an ongoing problem with vandalism from a particular IP address then just reverting it is fine and there's no need to notify anyone. If you do need to notify someone, please write a message on the Administrators' Noticeboard where it is more likely to be seen. Other than blocking, persistent vandals are reported to their ISP, employer or school via the OTRS system. I've had some success recently with getting schools to take action against persistent offenders where the school is in the UK. That's because they all have "acceptable use" policies for their students that mean they are willing to act on reports. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 14:57, 30 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for replying to this QuiteUnusual. As you can see, I am only active occasionally at the moment.--ЗAНИA ^talk 07:17, 3 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

In "American Indians Today" ( http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/American_Indians_Today/Tribes,_population_and_organization_in_and_out_the_reservations ), under the section 'American Indians outside the reservations,' is this statement: "...the Iroquois, who typically have a good head for heights..." This isn't any different than saying "African-Americans are good at sports," or "Asian-Americans are good at school," and while all those may be intended as positive stereotyping they're still stereotyping. A minimal revision, 'who are typically regarded within the construction business as having a good head for heights' would at least acknowledge the stereotyping. Since I don't actually know whether or not this claim is true, I will not make the edit myself, but wish to draw this to your attention. (I assume there's already been discussion over using 'American Indian' instead of 'Native American Tribes' or such?) Thanks for looking at it, whenever you return. A Michener (discuss • contribs) 12:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

edited because signature didn't seem to go through. New/infrequent user of the edit pages.

Thanks for your message and sorry for the super-late reply. I would suggest making the change if you feel it's right (I would agree that it can be construed as a stereotype). Regarding the use of Indian instead of Native American I think this is an Americanism and it's considered acceptable in the USA (although would be deeply offensive elsewhere certainly). Wikipedia's policy is to use any variety of English but I'm not sure if that applies here - again editors should be bold and make changes where they think appropriate although in this case that may be too many changes. I'd certainly support banning the use of 'Indian' except when referring to people from India.--ЗAНИA ^talk 19:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Xania. Although there are many news nowadays about this topic, Catalonia is just a region of Spain and not a country. Regards —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.71.202.66 (discuss • contribs) 14:59, 31 October 2014

<pi zero wonders what that's in relation to. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 19:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)>Reply

Back in May 2014, Xania edited the description of the picture of the Sagrada Familia in wikijunior:Europe to say that it was in Catalunya rather than Spain. While Catalunya (English spelling: Catalonia) has made noises in the past, and is still talking, about seceding from Spain and France, it has not yet done so and so Barcelona is still part of Spain. Chazz (talk) 22:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've heard rumors that Catalan Wikipedia has been systematically suppressing the fact that Catalonia is part of Spain. I've got nothing but contempt for revisionism, but of course I don't know first-hand what's going on there. I can see, though, how that sort of stuff going on could make folks hypersensitive on the issue. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 14:10, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Its a specific administrative zone not simply a region like, for example, Estremadura or Ribatejo in Portugal (even if these also have their own regional characteristics and "brand" they are not administratively independent of the "central" government) I would even classify it as a better defined administrative region then lets say Gibraltar (in terms of cultural identity and historical existence). --Panic (discuss • contribs) 00:11, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

As mentioned above, I described it as Catalonia because that's where it is. I would also describe the Highlands as being in Scotland, the Guggenheim as being in the Basque Country and the Peak District as England yet they're not proper countries either. At least the UK allows its people to vote for the future of their people rather than in Spain where Catalonians are being denied the chance to have a democratic vote - I guess that's why ca.wikipedia is taking such a stance at present. I will always stick up for the little guy and believe in the right to self-determination even if that is contrary to what many in Spain believe.--ЗAНИA ^talk 12:38, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I disagree with the absolute strictness of choice if not done with the purpose of clarity. For instance not many non central-southern Europeans will know about the Basque Country, so in certain contexts it would be correct to state simply Spain (or Basque Country an autonomous region of Spain if the point is relevant). In Europe due to its small size and extremely diverse regional diversity (even convoluted border evolution) it would be very confusing to only mention specific regions. This is even shared by many other small states like for instance Maryland (in the US) I think that strict mentions are only right if they add something to the content reader.

As for the political side of it I simply can't take you position serious as it is mired with exceptionalism, from the issues of "democratic votes", concepts of referendum and constitutional law, to the basic, and wrong, direct comparison of Scotland and Catalonia (very distinct cases). In any case even in Italy you have movements similar to these, for example 2.1 million Venetians just voted to leave Italy and restore their medieval republic.

I see borders as irrelevant and unnecessary, they exist more than anything to protect special interest groups that are becoming more and more irrelevant in the present globalized world. There is no gain (to all of us) in subdividing, we should be aggregating (properly, not like the present EU or the US Federal government examples). (Note that I'm using the terms in their original meaning) Nationalism makes no sense (the defense of the nation states) beyond the protection of the acquired rights of its people from usurpation by other nation states, I however see a greater value in patriotism (proud preservation of a region's history, culture, diversity and self reliance) there is an intrinsic good in keeping people motivated to uplift the status and reputation of their "homeland". --Panic (discuss • contribs) 14:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I never claimed not to understand why the Catalonians at ca.wp might do what (I hear) they're doing. I simply consider falsifying the record a contemptible act, not an incomprehensible one.

All this political discussion vindicates my choice of the word hypersensitive, as well. The question at hand is how to label a picture on a kids' book, not the political future of a region in Iberia. (If you wan to talk politics, when Westminster realized they might actually lose the Scottish referendum, and thereby lose all that North Sea oil, they launched a last-minute campaign of lying by equating a 'no' vote with devo max, just long enough to get a 'no' vote.) --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 16:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I probably shouldn't have got all political but the original poster did state that Catalonia is not a country. Maybe that would have been better worded as not a Sovereign state. I won't be changing any descriptions but, as this is a wiki, the original poster can do so if she wishes.--ЗAНИA ^talk 21:05, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Xania, it seems that through the Special:Import function, you already are a pretty significant contributor to Vikidia in english ! See here. :-)

By the way, I think that there is still some pretty good content to pick up from Wikijunior:Europe and Wikijunior:Languages. yet we are doing this with care, both choosing some article to import from Wikijunior and Simple English Wikipedia (many articles but just a part of them are good enough) and there is still some work on each article we import to fix and adapt it, see http://en.vikidia.org/w/index.php?title=European_Union&action=history for example. Astirmays (discuss • contribs) 08:04, 8 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

How might I find a good writer to contribute in areas where I am ignorant (e.g., Native Americans during that time)? Pittsburgh Poet (discuss • contribs) 01:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I saw your edit summary. There's nothing in the AbuseLog showing you tripped an edit filter. Do you remember the exact details of the message you received? QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 13:41, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I see - it was the spam blacklist. All links to Wikia are blacklisted - we can remove that, make it more specific or add some whitelist entries. Seems a bit broad to block them all. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 13:44, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, it was the spam blacklist not the abuse filter. Any reason for the blacklisting of Wikia sites? Surely it's not just because Wikia compete with Wikimedia in some areas? It seems like a good idea to recommend to users different sites if their contributions don't belong on this project.--ЗAНИA ^talk 19:50, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Before my time - I suggest we remove it from the blacklist. It can be re-added if it become a problem. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 22:19, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have sent an email, via OTRS (2014120110022032) to Mohd Saleem Ali who is listed as the contact for the IP address from which all of the bad edits in this book originate. I have requested they instruct their students to stop the copyright violations and follow the advice they are being given. If they don't, I am minded to hard block them. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 22:19, 1 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

That sounds good. Thanks. I started deleting a few of the pages concerned yesterday just to show that we aren't messing around. There are many more which should be deleted but I'll wait a few more days. I'd have to check but I'm pretty sure that not a single user in the class project has replied to any of the hundred messages that I've put on their talk pages.--ЗAНИA ^talk 23:48, 1 December 2014 (UTC).Reply

Ashwin230 (discuss • contribs) 20:54, 2 December 2014 (UTC)Ashwin, dear Sir, I would like to bring in your kind notice that the work you've mentioned as "possible copyright infringement"Fluid_Mechanics_Applications/B51:GENERATION_OF_RENEWABLE_ENERGY is not at all linked to the work you've mentioned as possible copyright violation of. I can assure you, if you read through the content you would be able to identify that only a few generalized words have been same by some coincidence which should be considered as normal as they were used in the definition and were universally true.So, i would request you to take back the issue you reported.Thanks!Reply

I have just done a search using random groups of one and a half sentences. I did 4 searches. 3 of the searches on Google revealed that the identical phrase was used in a Wikipedia article. The 4th search came from http://books.google.com/books?id=8X1IsAx5KcIC (search criteria: and generator.Components of a horizontal axis wind turbine (gearbox, rotor shaft and brake assembly) being lifted into). I will remove the Copyright notice (although I see you've already done so) but phrases taken from the book mentioned in the link above will need to be written. Furthermore, you cannot copy and paste from Wikipedia. This is not permitted because the license used when people contribute to Wikipedia requires that a list of contributors to the article be maintained. Therefore when you copy and paste the contributors list is lost. If you want to use anything from Wikipedia you must request the page be imported at Wikibooks:Requests for Import.

I've been doing a certain amount of review of Pages with pending changes lately. In light of this discussion, I am very carefully not reviewing changes to the Fluid Mechanics Applications book... I have to say, it does seem to be growing significantly faster than I would expect for a book of this complexity. Chazz (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have begun a full review - at least half the pages are unambiguous violations and have been deleted. Repeat offenders are being blocked until they agree to desist. I've also hard blocked the school IP to give time to review the mess as it is being created too quickly to check properly. QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 17:04, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good to me. Your note on the main page says all editing tomthe book has been blocked but I notice that edits are still being made. I'll keep an eye on parts of the book and the parts which I've already labeled as being copyvios. I started from the bottom of the main index and did random Google searches of random samples of text (usually 15-20 words long stretching over at least one sentence) - about 50% so far have had some kind of copyvio. However, a few of these are just copy and paste from Wikipedia. Wha probably annoys me most is the almost complete lack of replies to any messages posted on user talk pages.--ЗAНИA ^talk 23:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

The school IP addresses appear to be blocked but out of school hours they begin to edit again, presumably from home. Also there are a couple I blocked who then engaged in discussion who I have unblocked after they appeared to "get it". QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 13:46, 6 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Dear Admin, Please bring my page on the book back as I was informed of the issue of copyright violations on the 4th of December and I was told that I had about a week's time. But just the morning of the day after my page was deleted. Please put my page back and tell me about the copy right issues. And I shall handle it.

I have replied to this user's message on their talk page.--ЗAНИA ^talk 17:14, 7 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Deer admin, I hereby speak for no one but me I am just responsible for my page. And as far as I know I was given a week's span but my page was deleted far earlier than that. I didn't expect you to work without warning. Either way please undo the removal of my page and how do I sign this thing? If I sign it and the other page's editors don't then still do I get my page back? Cause I was warned on 4.11.2014 and given a weeks span.

I think QuiteUnusual has dealt with this and he has now re-created the page.--ЗAНИA ^talk 10:49, 8 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Should that page be reviewed and accepted? 11 pending edits as of now... Does that page have a copyright violation? The Contributions page does raise a question. --Leaderboard 11:38, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

If the edits aren't vandalism then accept it. If you like you can select a few random sentences from the text and do a Google search to see if it's a copy and paste from elsewhere. If so then tag the page with {{copyvio|URL of source}}. --ЗAНИA ^talk 14:08, 14 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I don't know enough about templates to make what ought to be a trivial change to this template... What it does right now is very nearly right. In the top left corner of the page, among other things, it creates the links "prev chapter | next chapter" with chapter numbers. The problem is that there's no way to navigate back up to the book overview from that link, or anywhere else on the page. Would it be possible to change that so that either it added a book link between the next and previous, or so that it made the book title in the line below that one into a link to the book overview? Thank you kindly... Chazz (talk) 00:57, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Chazz. I've had a look but I also don't know enough to make the change so I have copied your message to QuiteUnusual's talk page as I think he may be better at this.--ЗAНИA ^talk 09:35, 15 December 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've reverted the change by an IP user because that edit seems to be copied from Wikipedia(or at least significant parts of it). Can you tell me whether this reversion was correct? The edit by the user is [[1]] --Leaderboard 09:32, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Your actions look fine to me. I have left a note on the IP user's talk page. If they want they can look at the History and copy in the parts which weren't copied from Wikipedia. Good work.--ЗAНИA ^talk 13:03, 1 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm not sure whether or not you saw the message I left for you on en:User talk:Xania. If not here's a notice that they're there, then. Resident Mario (discuss • contribs) 16:12, 19 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back (for a bit, at least) ;-) --atcovi (talk) 22:38, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Xania First, thanks for your contributions on the wikibook Koine Greek, it's really useful! However, I stumpled an oddity regarding the examples given on this page, regarding 1st declension nouns: https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Koine_Greek/5._Declining_1st_and_2nd_Declension_Nouns

In the table for 1st declension pattern 1, it says that the plural vocative should end in -αι, but in the example just below it, καρδία in vocative plural is given as καρδία instead of καρδίαι. When I compare it to the wiktionary entry (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%CE%BA%CE%B1%CF%81%CE%B4%CE%AF%CE%B1) it seems like it should have been καρδίαι, right? The same goes for the examples φωνή and δόξα.

If this happens to be correct, I'm not asking for an explanation, I just want to know whether this is an error or not :)

Have a wonderful day!

Could you please add in MediaWiki:Common.css the following code:

.nobuttons input.searchboxSearchButton {display:none;}

Details and further discussions on that topic on my discussion pageː User talk:Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran#Request to an SysOpː Add code to CSS

I really need this code for my project. Thanksǃ --Thirunavukkarasye-Raveendran (discuss • contribs) 13:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are beginning the transition to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this email because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. The general confidentiality agreement is now ready, and the OTRS agreement will be ready after 22 September 2015. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 22 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 23:33, 15 September 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get help

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.

I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 April 2014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015, you will lose your access to nonpublic information.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 15 December 2015 (OTRS users have until 31 December 2015) to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

Thank you,
Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 08:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC) • Translate • Get helpReply

Done. --ЗAНИA ^talk 14:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Noticed a problem in Template:Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Book/Page which could stand to be fixed... specifically there's no way to backtrack from the chapter page (e.g. Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Books/Order of the Phoenix/Chapter 4) back up to the book page (Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Books/Order of the Phoenix). The template does include the book title as "Harry Potter and the BOOK", where BOOK is a parameter that is filled in. Would it be possible to make that into a link to "Muggles' Guide to Harry Potter/Books/BOOK" as well? Chazz (talk) 21:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation.

This is a reminder to acknowledge and sign the new m:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information. As you know, your volunteer role in Wikimedia projects gives you access to secure and sensitive information.

The new version includes one major change.

• There is a change regarding the way personal data may be released. Accordingly, functionaries must notify the Wikimedia Foundation at check-disclosurewikimedia.org before releasing data, in order to obtain a written approval for doing so. The Foundation will respond within 10 days. However, for emergencies, such as cases involving threats of violence, functionaries may release the personal data without such explicit permission, but they should notify the Foundation immediately following the disclosure. If they choose not to disclose the data, the request for disclosure should be forwarded to the Foundation's emergency email address (emergencywikimedia.org).

There are also some wording changes that were made to more closely align the language with evolving industry norms, best practices and laws. The most notable of these has been the change of the term "nonpublic information" to "nonpublic personal data". None of these changes are intended to make fundamental changes to the scope or practice of the policy but we know they could appear as such, hence wanted to flag them.

The aforementioned changes require users that have already signed the previous version of the policy to sign the new version as well.

We therefore ask that you to sign the updated version. Signing the agreement is tracked on Phabricator's Legalpad. An online guide is available to help you with signing the agreement: m:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign. If you wish you can sign it directly at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/L37. The exact policy is located here: m:Access to nonpublic personal data policy. The text of the confidentiality agreement is located here: m:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information

If you have already received this message and signed the updated agreement, you need not sign it again. Once is sufficient. In this case, we ask that you respond to Samuel (WMF) letting him know when (date) and how (method/process of signing) you have signed it so that we can update our own records.

Note: please bear in mind that if you still haven’t signed the updated version of the Confidentiality Agreement by February 13, 2019 your rights will be removed.

Thank you for your understanding,

Samuel Guebo (User:Samuel (WMF)), Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery 16:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

This has now been signed (twice, once for Check User issues and another for OTRS) --ЗAНИA ^talk 04:21, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Yeah I got a reminder even though I've signed it. I assume the WMF is not reconciling across people who have multiple access rights that require signing. If you check the Noticeboard you can see if your signature has been noted. I can't see you on there though... QuiteUnusual (discuss • contribs) 13:08, 18 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

how do I add contents box

On most pages a contents box will appear automatically provided you separate your sections with headers. Use == TITLE == to make headers which will then appear in the contents box at the top of the page.--ЗAНИA ^talk 06:46, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

does each part title have to be in all caps — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anayguy‎ (talk • contribs) 20:07, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Anayguy. No, they don't have to be in all caps. --Pi zero (discuss • contribs) 20:20, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

how do I make a chart set up Anayguy (discuss • contribs) 19:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC) User:Anayguy Anayguy (discuss • contribs) 19:57, 5 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Xania, there is currently a proposal at Wikibooks:Reading room/Proposals for non-admins to be given the ability of Suppress redirect and Move subpages. Since you’ve been an active user on Wikibooks for the last thirty day, I thought you might join in by giving feedback/opinion or amendments. Thank you so much for your time Synoman Barris (discuss • contribs) 12:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hello Xania,

I see that you've been approving my edits to the OpenSCAD Tutorial/Chapter 8 recently. Thank you for the help!

I recently made a new edit to OpenSCAD Tutorial/Chapter 8 while not logged in. As a result, the IP address I happened to be using at the time was published. I undid the change, but the edit remained. Could you please mask the IP address, attribute the change to me, or remove the edit from the history? Thanks so much!

Done --Xania ^talk 07:23, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

See Special:diff/4069241. _{L10nM4st3r/Roar at me} 21:17, 31 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I see. Thanks Xania ^talk 06:35, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

also Special:diff/4078382. Please be a bit more careful. ^L10nM4st3r / _{Roar at me} 06:53, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Excuse me? No need to be rude. I check hundreds of edits every week so there are bound to be some mistakes. We are all volunteers here and I do not appreciate being left messages like this.--Xania ^talk 08:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry if I seemed rude. Just wanted to point them out. I'll stop with these then. Thanks for letting me know you don't want them. And yes, we all make mistakes. ^L10nM4st3r / _{Roar at me} 11:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

No problem.--Xania ^talk 01:49, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Elliot Harkness is stupid" something along those lines. _{L10nM4st3r/Roar at me} 22:23, 27 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Someone else did it. I was offline.--Xania ^talk 10:44, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

How can I link recent changes with parameters (e.g: "?hidenewpages=1") in a way that would work on any wiki correctly (for use on my global userpage, which I spent all day improving)? Thanks. _{L10nM4st3r/Roar at me} 14:52, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm not very technical I'm afraid. hidenewpages=1 is definitely the parameter to use for not showing new pages. For use on any wiki would [[../Special:RecentChanges?hidebots=1&hidecategorization=1|this]] not work? --Xania ^talk 00:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it will. if index.php?title=RecentChanges doesnt work, I don't know what will. Also, hidenewpages=1 was on my bookmarked url for recent changes, but hid no new pages. At least that isn't what I want. _{L10nM4st3r/Roar at me} 06:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Why have my edits been reverted? I do not think the information I was presenting was incorrect. ISaveNewspapers (discuss • contribs) 15:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

I think it was one edit, the others were not reverted. My mistake.--Xania ^talk 11:27, 17 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Ok, I will correct it. ISaveNewspapers (discuss • contribs) 23:04, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Generally, IPs shouldn't be blocked indefinitely as it will be randomly assigned to different users. Kindly review the blocks you made and adjust accordingly. Thanks. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Excuse me? There was valid reason for these blocks and a notice was posted on the talk pages of the IP users which would allow them to appeal the ban. Why are you posting this and why also post the same message to two other WB sysops? Very strange behavior.--Xania ^talk 11:45, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Seriously considering leaving the project following messages like this. This is exactly the kind of thing which turns people off Wikimedia.--Xania ^talk 13:21, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please don't leave, we need you ! Besides, if we had no active admins, it wouldn't be good, would it? ^{— L10nM4st3r} / _{ROAR at me!} 15:07, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Wikibooks:Reading room/Assistance#How do I improve my wikibook, or is it impossible to improve it? Vinyasi (discuss • contribs) 03:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

On the page JavaScript/Self Test an anonym IP address made a small extension to the template, and you checked it. I do not understand the reason for this extension. What does it do? --Kelti (discuss • contribs) 10:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Apologies, should not have been approved. It has now been rejected.--Xania ^talk 10:44, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

After activating Mozilla VPN I got to the range of blocked IP addresses. I believe that I have understood what's going on there. But: Do you have an advice on how to handle this situation smartly? --Kelti (discuss • contribs) 10:34, 3 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

it will be greatly used againt u n entire wmf! 187.135.119.244 (discuss) 05:39, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Enjoy your block.--Xania ^talk 05:45, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Xania, I probably wouldn't have responded to our WMF-banned amigo unless you want a bunch of spam emails coming your way, at least per w:WP:DENY.

Ljupco, you should probably spend some time enjoying your WMF-ban by abstaining from hitting the edit button. SHB2000 (discuss • contribs) 09:05, 8 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Your feedback would be welcome and appreciated at Cookbook_talk:Policy/Recipe_template#Style_guidelines. Thanks! —Kittycataclysm (discuss • contribs) 15:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

... tell me if my correction, Source: Own work derived from Own work, fixes the problem with my having taken a picture of a motor and inserted it into another image both of which are of my own creation? Thank you. -- Vinyasi (discuss • contribs) 06:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Do not post warnings to the LTAs, like the IP user 190.104.112.152. Xeverything11 (discuss • contribs) 08:35, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

How was I supposed to know it was a LTA? If you bothered to look at my edit history you will notice that I have blocked many, many LTA accounts this week and not once did I post a warning or other notice on their talk page. You need to phrase messages like this in. a more polite manner "Do not post warnings" is not a friendly way to address this problem.--Xania ^talk 08:58, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Yea, how are you supposed to easily know the difference between an LTA and a normal vandal? ^{— L10nM4st3r} / _{ROAR at me!} 09:06, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

My warning on the IP's page was related to their edit summary rather than the edit itself. They added a comma to a page which seemed reasonable (though since reverted) but left an abusive edit summary. No real indication that it was a LTA. And if I choose to post a message to a user that's my business. WP:DENY does not apply here - this is Wikibooks.--Xania ^talk 09:09, 1 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

I'm a bit late to this, but my 2 cents is I agree with Xeverything11 that warning LTAs is not appropriate per WP:DENY (though I disagree with warning all obvious vandals, but that's a discussion for another day), but it's unreasonable to expect someone to know every LTA. SHB2000 (discuss • contribs) 22:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

But this is not Wikipedia. This is Wikibooks. No such policy or guideline applies here. And, as I have said before, it was not apparent that this was a LTA. My whole point in this thread was the disrespectful message posted on my talk page by Xeverything. He/she was telling me what to do rather than suggesting or advising something.--Xania ^talk 05:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Can you unblock User:Jsarah29? The user is a student in a class run by User:Doctorxgc, and just registered their account at a university computer lab, which likely led to the false positive CU. Thanks for your help! Pharos (discuss • contribs) 15:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help with this. Can you also unblock User:Jeseniaespinal90, who is in the same situation? Also User:DeyviAlvaradoLopez is another student in the same class and appears to have been affected as well, although that account is not explicitly blocked.--Pharos (discuss • contribs) 14:14, 16 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

The other account has been unblocked now. The last account wasn't unblocked though and has made edits since your post on this talk page.--Xania ^talk 00:49, 19 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, please do not mark random garbage as reviewed. Particularly for edits like this it should have been pretty obvious that they were blatant nonsense. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:35, 30 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

It did not seem obvious that it was nonsense. Good that those watching the page caught it though.--Xania ^talk 00:53, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

It took a while. Since you are also a CU, you might want to have a look at User talk:MarcGarver#Special:Contributions/Matthew Tameirao since disruption appears to continue. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 01:09, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

I had a quick look. All related and blocked.--Xania ^talk 01:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ashtontameirao2500 (discuss · email · contribs · logs · count) is a pretty obvious sock given the username and editing area (and MatthewTameirao648 (discuss · email · contribs · logs · count) might be a sleeper). 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 01:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I have checked out these accounts and they are all related. The users have been blocked permanently, the IP addresses have been given short blocks.--Xania ^talk 01:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, why are you continuing to do this even after getting a hint that this is likely to be problematic? 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:02, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I found the webpage, https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Folkstyle_Wrestling/Advanced_Wrestling_Strategy, when I was looking for something about backyard wrestling. I decided to make minor edits to it given what was already there. Only later, did I realize this webpage which is sort of about backyard wrestling has been placed under the topic, Folkstyle wrestling. Folkstyle wrestling is an amateur style of wrestling that is not the same as what is on this webpage. 1) Folkstyle wrestling has weight classes. This webpage talks about "size concerns" where your opponent is a different size from you. 2) Folkstyle wrestling does have a mounted pin position, which goes by many names. Some of those names are "double grapevine pin" or "saturday night ride pin".

  The mount described on this webpage is more for a backyard style of wrestling, and the description is inappropriate for non-adults.

I am a noob when it comes to editing wiki. If I try to fix things, I will only make a big mess. I am also a noob when it comes to Folkstyle wrestling. Any comments I make would be questionable.

Please move this webpage to an appropriate spot or delete this webpage. Please consider whether parts of this webpage are appropriate for minors and restrict this webpage as appropriate. Please contact a knowledgeable person about Folkstyle wrestling who can provide accurate information on the topic.

I am posting this topic to your page because you approved a minor edit I made when I didn't know the information on this webpage was in the wrong place and/or inappropriate. Ricks9001 (discuss • contribs) 11:25, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Wikibooks is not censored. We will not edit content to remove "unsuitable for minors" content, not will we protect it / hide it from anyone. In terms of the other comments, this is a collaborative volunteer project. We will not delete a page just because it doesn't appear to fit in the scope of a book. The answer is either to increase the scope of the book, or create a new book. But nobody is going to do that for you - you either need to do it yourself, or leave it until someone else decides it's a good idea. Chances are, it won't be changed. MarcGarver (discuss • contribs) 12:54, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Ricks9001 (discuss • contribs) 06:45, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Using Wikibooks is a good start for learning how to edit pages.--Xania ^talk 00:34, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Ricks9001 (discuss • contribs) 07:49, 3 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I was hoping you could help me out with this. Some edits I made on the "Vehicle Identification Numbers (VIN codes)/World Manufacturer Identifier (WMI)" page, namely WMI codes for Brazil (they start with 9B-9D & 92-99), show up when you go into "Edit Source" but they don't show up when you simply look at the page when not in editing mode. I thought somebody reverted my edits but I found that was not the case. The "Revision as of 21:02, 4 August 2023" shows up in the "View History" as unaltered and unreverted. I can't find any reason for this situation so I was hoping that you might know and could clue me in. Thank you. JustTheFacts33 (discuss • contribs) 02:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I have just looked and it seems OK now. Is it OK now?--Xania ^talk 05:18, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

No, same problem as before. If you look under "Edit Source", you will see many codes that don't show up when you look at the page in normal mode such as 9BD & then 94N, 94T, 95P, 95V, 95Z, 953, 96P, 97N, 988, 98M all the way through to 99Z. JustTheFacts33 (discuss • contribs) 09:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Xania, I figured it out. The WMI codes that were not showing up had a dash between the vertical line at the left and the code itself which was causing these particular codes not to show on the page when you looked at it in regular format. Here's an example of what I mean: |-99Z . Not sure how that happened, maybe from copy/paste. Didn't even realize it had happened until just now. Once that dash was removed, everything showed up normally. Thanks for your time. JustTheFacts33 (discuss • contribs) 13:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

That's good to know. --Xania ^talk 06:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Just wanted to say thank you for going through many of the pages I've been flagging! Cheers —Kittycataclysm (discuss • contribs) 03:52, 25 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

I am dealing with an incredible amount of mixed backlash on my edits on the Wikibook “Catholicism” namely the Glossary page. There are inconsistencies with the changes being made.

Definitions are being redirected to Wiki’s (in this case Wiktionary) and every time progress is made, Kittycataclysm destroys it again.

Please correct these issues and this users actions so this site doesn’t continue to fall apart. Twillisjr (discuss • contribs) 12:58, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikibooks discourages external links because it is intended to create self-contained books that can be saved, or printed, and used offline - just like a print book. Therefore, rather than adding lots of links, you should put the actual definitions in the book. MarcGarver (discuss • contribs) 15:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May I insert images like a gallery? (Asking in advance) Twillisjr (discuss • contribs) 15:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

That should be fine --Xania ^talk 02:33, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I look forward to hearing from you. MathXplore (discuss • contribs) 07:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I didn't receive any email except for a notification about this post.--Xania ^talk 03:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

My email was related to special:permalink/4409363. MathXplore (discuss • contribs) 03:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Done --Xania ^talk 03:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Do you think special:permalink/4416440 is acceptable? MathXplore (discuss • contribs) 07:11, 17 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the late reply, I was away. Looks OK - not too much personal info. --Xania ^talk 02:44, 2 July 2024 (UTC)Reply