...It is also clear that the contingent migrant workforce in the US was highest in number, but the ratio thereof was lowest in 2006.
...It is also clear that the contingent migrant workforce in the US was highest in number, but the ratio of them was lowest in 2006.
...It is also clear that the contingent migrant workforce in the US was highest in number, but their ratio was lowest in 2006.
Them here refers to the contingent migrant workforce in the US. Which version do you think is best? If none of them are good, could you provide a better alternative?
Finally, is there any difference if I use "rate" instead of "ratio"?
The table below shows the number of temporary migrant workers in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1.000 people in these countries in 2006.
Temporary migrant workers (2003 and 2006)
Country | 2003 | 2006 | Per 1000 people 2006 |
---|---|---|---|
New Zealand | 65.000 | 87.000 | 21.1 |
United Kingdom | 137.000 | 266.000 | 4.4 |
Australia | 152.000 | 219.000 | 10.7 |
United States | 577.000 | 678.000 | 2.3 |