0
\$\begingroup\$

I am currently working with solutions to pass the ESD-requirements for EMC. I have used TVS (ESD)-diodes in the past to good result, but never really understood exactly why they work. Sadly, this is one of those topics where you ask 3 different electronics engineers and get 10 different answers. But I'm going try anyway :)

First, my system: I have a system where I have digital electronics supplied by an AC/DC PSU. The power comes from 230VAC L+N combination (Europe) with a separate PE (Protective Earth, the yellow/green wire) from "the socket outlet". This PE is connected to the chassis of my device. The digital electronics is supplied by the 24VDC with a separate GND connection (0VDC, black cable) from the PSU. I have not connected the the GND/0VDC and the PE myself in any way. I'm fairly certain they are not connected within the PSU, except through maybe a resistor and a Y-capacitor. Also, most signal lines have an RC-filter (100R-10k + 10nF-100nF) for the signal. I imagine these will protect the signal to some extent as well?

General system setup PCB setup

As for my questions:

  1. Where does the energy from the ESD event go? I know that the TVS diodes (Uni-dir) will start to conduct in reverse when the voltage gets too high (<Vbr). This creates a low-impedance path for the energy through the diode. However, where does that energy go next? I've seen people claim it's dissipated in the diode as heat, though does this actually happen if the path is low-impedance? Shouldn't it actually continue until it reaches whatever it's referenced to (which in this case would be PE, since that's what the ESD gun is referenced to). If there is no path directly from the signal line to PE through the diode, wouldn't it then just pass through the GND-plane on my PCB, causing all sorts of bad things? I can imagine that it will eventually reach PE through the Y-capacitor in the PSU.

  2. How can I create a shorter path for the event to PE? If we assume that the ESD event is not fully dissipated in the diode, is there any good way to create a shorter return path to PE? I'm of course referring to the broader question "Can/should I connect GND to PE and how?". What safety implications do the various methods have (for example if you rely on PELV/SELV protection against electric shock)? How might it impact radiated emissions (you risk creating ground loops for example). I have a couple of different methods that I'm unsure what impact they would have:

2.1 Connect directly (PE<->GND) My guess is that this method will probably protect well against ESD, but might risk causing ground loops and that noise is highly exported everywhere. Probably not a good idea.

2.2 Connect through R+C RC connection

This connects GND and PE through R+C in series. I imagine this will have the effect of only allowing high frequencies to pass as well as limiting the current through the system. This is similar to the connection in a PSU. I imagine the downside here is that it won't react "as fast" due to the resistor creating a higher impedance path. Here you can of course select the capacitor and resistor accordingly. My guess is that they must be able to handle high voltages and that their values should be fairly low (C=1nF-100nF, R<100ohm), but this is just handwaving. If I recall correctly, the ESD event is discharged from the ESD gun with a 330ohm resistor (thereabouts), so anything lower than that should be ok? Maybe someone could shed some light on if this is a good idea, and if so, what values to choose. 2.3 Dual TVS diodes TVS diodes connection

My colleague suggested this idea. It's basically two TVS diodes connected in reverse towards eachother. This will block any connection between PE and GND until the voltage difference gets sufficiently high, which will only happen during an ESD event (Or something else going horribly wrong). If the Vbr for the diodes is selected sufficiently high, I imagine noise would not get through, though an ESD event will. Since the voltage difference normally would be very low (ideally should be close to 0), the Vbr for the diodes can be selected rather low. My questions regarding this: Is it a good idea? I've never seen anyone else do this before. What Vbr is good to aim for? Is this connection using 2 uni-dir TVS diodes equivalent to using a single bi-dir TVS diode? Most often the symbol is drawn the other way around, but I have seen TVS diode symbols been drawn this way too (compare the SMAJ series with the SD-C series).

To summarize: Project with metal chassis, supplied by AC+PE. AC/DC PSU supplies low-voltage boards. Boards are only connected to GND/0V, while chassis is PE. How to protect the board properly from ESD-strikes? Should GND and PE be connected and if so, how? Where does the ESD energy actually go if you have TVS-diodes?

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hello there -- you've documented the mains input and PCB arrangement well, but said nothing about the connectors; this seems a critical piece of the puzzle! For example, are they shielded, does the shield connect to the enclosure? (If not, you're getting almost no EMC value from the enclosure, and it could just as well be cheaper plastic.) What kind of surge could they be exposed to? Handling (ESD)? Facility wiring runs (EFT)? Long cable runs (lightning-induced surge)? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 21 at 11:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ What are your requirements, or reasoning, for maintaining a pseudo-isolated DC ground? There are reasons to do such a thing with shielded Ethernet connections, where the connections are isolated. Why pursue that in your design? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 21 at 12:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ @TimWilliams Regarding the connectors, they are largely non-shielded. If there is a shield on a connector, it's usually connected to PCB GND. We do have some buttons made of metal that might be connected to the chassis (I'm saying "might" because they are anodized aluminium or steel and might not have full connection). The ESD-events are mainly user based, as simulated by an ESD gun (IEC 61000-4-2). \$\endgroup\$
    – sternis1
    Commented May 23 at 7:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ChrisKnudsen: I guess I don't have any clear reason for retaining the isolated DC ground. It's part of why I'm asking; is it a good idea to keep this isolation and what are the downsides of not keeping it? I have two main concerns regarding connecting GND and PE: 1. Ground loops causing excess EMI (we already have HUGE problems with radiated emissions due to a large VFD). Either importing noise to sensitive electronics or exporting high-speed clocks. 2. Potential concerns regarding safety standards for protection against electric shock (LVD, IEC 60204). We rely on PELV/SELV for some parts. \$\endgroup\$
    – sternis1
    Commented May 23 at 7:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ok, what about connected equipment then: is it grounded through the mating connector(s)? Are differential inputs used? How sensitive are they, will noise floor, jitter, etc. be affected by ground loop? How likely is it that a user encounters a ground loop problem, are the equipment likely to be plugged in in different locations? \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 23 at 12:37

0

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.