0
\$\begingroup\$

I am designing a circuit for a automotive application that requires a stable regulated 12V supply. The supply in turn must be powered by an automotive battery.

I am currently looking at using a automotive-rated buck-boost converter such as the TPS552882-Q1 as my 12V supply source. My question is would the converter by itself already handle any under/over voltage conditions? For example, the converter linked is rated between 2.7V and 36V which covers the range of typical automotive conditions.

Is the buck-boost enough or do I need to pursue additional mitigations such as TVS's, crowbar, or other related circuit-protection devices? If so, why are these additional mitigations needed?

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Personal or commercial product? Also, although more recent vehicles often include circuitry to reduce the impact of load dumps, older vehicles do not. And these can well exceed 100 V. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 9 at 1:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ @periblepsis It is a personal product, but also going into an older vehicle (1989) \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 9 at 4:08
  • \$\begingroup\$ Start with this Wiki page and a quick google search also found this TI pdf appnote. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 9 at 5:10

1 Answer 1

0
\$\begingroup\$

Is the buck-boost enough or do I need to pursue additional mitigations such as TVS's, crowbar, or other related circuit-protection devices? If so, why are these additional mitigations needed?

Short answer: Yes, you need other mitigations. Reason: speed. The buck-boost is too slow to deal with the very fast voltage transients, which are in the nanosecond range.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ I know that TVS's can be good at responding to fast transients. How can I figure out the range of times that my buck-boost can handle to ensure I don't have a gap when selecting a TVS. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 8 at 18:26
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If this is just a personal project then I wouldn't be too concerned. However, if this is a commercial product, then protecting this product from being damaged, or causing damage, or worse: causing harm to a person as a consequence of suffering a foreseeable voltage transient, then you do really need to spend significant design effort on these mitigations. This is beyond the scope of this answer. \$\endgroup\$ Commented May 8 at 18:41

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.