I have seen many questions on this and other forums asking about the best option to place the fuse relative to the varistor to protect it from mains voltage spikes and the answer was unanimous: The fuse should be placed before the Varistor. The only reason stated is that the Varistor may not be able to withstand the current until the breaker trips and need something to open the circuit before the breaker: the fuse.
I understand that it is the best for safety.
However, I've seen many appliances that are sold in Europe with the Varistor before the fuse. I started to wonder why and I could definitely think of one possible advantage.
If the fuse is placed before the Varistor (best practise), in the event of overvoltage, the Varistor will short, draw a lot of current and ALWAYS blow the fuse before the breaker trips. Therefore, in any overvoltage event, the appliance would be rendered useless until the appliance is disassembled and the fuse is replaced. On the other hand, if the fuse is placed after the Varistor (not best practise), and the Varistor is the first component after mains voltage, in the event of overvoltage, there are two possibilities:
- The Varistor shorts and gets overwhelmed by the current and fails open, before the breaker trips, leaving the circuit unprotected and exposed to the voltage spike. In this case, it would definitely have been better to have the fuse before the Varistor.
- The Varistor shorts and the breaker trips before the Varistor gets overwhelmed by the current. In this case, it would have been definitely better than having the Fuse before the Varistor because as soon as the breaker is reset, the appliance will be working again without any problem. If the fuse was before the Varistor, the fuse would be blown and the appliance would not work until the fuse is replaced.
In short, if the first case is verified, it would be better to have placed the fuse before the Varistor. However, if the second case is verified, it would have been better to have the fuse after the Varistor so that the appliance is ready to use after the flip of a breaker lever.
So I decided to run some tests in attempt to determine which case is more likely.
I tested a 7D181K Varistor, that is, a 7 diameter Varistor that starts conducting 1 mA at aproximately 181 V across it, with a maximum clamping voltage of 300V. I connected it to 230V AC mains voltage, causing it to be conducting for some part of the sinewave. The instant I connected it to mains, it tripped not only the 16A breaker but also the main 30A breaker, in series with the entire house. I kept subjecting it to 230V AC mains. It has tripped the breaker a total of 5 times without getting overwhelmed by the mains voltage. Only after 5 times, did it fail compeletely open, actually getting split in half.
Then I tested 14D181K Varistor, that is, a 14 diameter Varistor that starts conducting 1 mA at aproximately 181 V across it, with a maximum clamping voltage of 300V. I repeated the test I found out that it could withstand more than 10 times being subjected to 230V AC mains voltage. Since it was not quitting, I got tired and connected it between two phases, to 400V AC, leveraging the properties of 3-phase AC. It was only after being subject to 400V AC for 10 times that it finally failed, also being split in half.
I understand that the results of my test are not a silver bullet, but I confess I'm now definitely very confident that a Varistor doesn't need a fuse before it to ensure it doesn't get overwhelmed by mains voltage, especially if the Varistor has a significantly high diameter, at least for 5 cycles of activation and that a 16A or even 30A breaker will do the job.
Therefore, I conclude that the only reason that is mostly stated for placing the fuse before the Varistor is not really that much of a concern.
So my final question is: What is the risk of placing a Varistor before the Fuse beyond the Varistor not being able to handle the surge?
One risk I can think of is the Varistor failing, drawing a current less that trip current of a breaker and dissipating a lot of heat, possibly starting a fire. How likely is this to happen? Is it low probability enough to justify the usability of not having to disassemble an appliance to replace the fuse, considering the appliance takes like 2 hours to disassemble and reassemble?
Are there possibly any other risks I'm not thinking of?