I heard that Lock-in amplifiers (LIAs) especially play to their strengths when the signals are weak compared to the noise level. But then I talked with someone about it, who understands the principles of lock-in amplification, and she said - which makes sense to me now - that of course the signal amplitude still needs to be larger than the level of noise. Otherwise we couldn't represent the signal V_s like this: $$ V_{s} = R\cdot cos(\omega_{s} t + \phi) $$ Is that correct? I find the formulation "buried in noise" a bit confusing then...
PS: I often get criticized for not explaining enough about the basics of the topic that I ask my question about. Since I don't want my question to get closed again, I would like to refer you to this page, which I used to learn about it: https://www.zhinst.com/others/en/resources/principles-of-lock-in-detection Also, to forestall criticism that I just stipulate that "buried in noise" is an existent phrase in this context, I would refer you to this page, where you can see some examples of this phrase: https://preview.tinyurl.com/y64re9ln (secure URL: only preview of website, that would otherwise redirect to a Google domain)