0
\$\begingroup\$

So I'm very, very new to electronics so this may be a really dumb question but here goes. Is there a motor that either a. is designed to be constantly overloaded or b. run in such a way that overloading it will not cause it to fail?

Here is the thought experiment that I would like to solve. Imagine an electric winch towing in a truck with say 1,000 lbs of force, though capable of towing in with let's say 10,000 lbs of force total. The truck is just in neutral and not providing any force in the opposite direction.

Now, imagine that the truck was put into drive and started pulling on the winch with a force of 1,100 lbs of force. In this situation the winch would be overloaded (is that the right word) and the truck would start to increase it's distance away from the winch.

Next, imagine the winch being able to sense this increased force by the truck (let's just assume that this is possible through the use of other sensors and microcontrollers) and then automatically increases it's towing force to 1,200 lbs. At this point that truck will now be pulled back in towards to winch.

Let's assume that this push and pull process continues indefinitely until the truck runs out of gas and is eventually towed all the way in. Also, let's assume that the force the truck exerts in the opposite direction NEVER exceeds the maximum 10,000 lbs total towing capability of the winch. Also, let's assume that the winch should always exert a pulling force. Meaning that we should not ever have it halt even when being overloaded by the truck.

Are there such motors out there that can operate effectively under these conditions? In my mind it seems illogical that motors would be designed for these types of purposes but I'm not sure.

Anyways, despite being very, very new to electronics here is my current thinking on this problem. From what I've read simply overloading a motor isn't the problem, but instead the overheating caused by overloading is the problem. And any time a motor is overheated beyond specifications then failure can occur. However, if a motor is overloaded while operating at only 1/10th (or some other small percentage) of it's total capabilities then the heat caused by overloading will probably not be too much for the motor to handle, right?

Like, I said this may be a really dumb question but it's one that I'm curious about and could not find the answer to anywhere else. It could be that this type of action is impossible from a physics standpoint as well, but I'm unsure. Thanks in advance for the help!!

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ The nominal load is the load which may be applied for an unlimited time. E.g. locomotives have also specified an hour-load which may be applied for one hour. Then, cooling down to ambient temperature is needed. That load is used to calculate acceleration power and power on steep gradients. It's usually only applied for a few minutes, so the train may pull at nominal power instead of cooling down afterwards. \$\endgroup\$
    – Janka
    Commented Jun 17, 2018 at 17:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ I think you got some common sense wrong. If you ahve a X watt motor that can constantly be overlaoded to Y watt, then actually you ahve an Y watt motor. Overload means running something ABOVE the long term "safe" load level. If you add all the logic together then no, it is impossible to have a motor that can constantly run overloaded at Y because that would not be the overloaded load level. \$\endgroup\$
    – TomTom
    Commented Jun 17, 2018 at 21:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ The existing answers already point out your confusion about the "overload" concept. Are you aware of Tesla's and other cars that can use their electrical engines as generators? Not only does this provide a braking force, generating the braking force also generates an electrical current. \$\endgroup\$
    – MSalters
    Commented Jun 17, 2018 at 21:27

4 Answers 4

4
\$\begingroup\$

Engineers use "overload" to indicate that that level is not intended for continuous use.

I mean, if a product is rated for say 900 W but a continuous overload at 1000 W is allowed, then why not simply call it 1000 W. As it can handle 1000 W continuously, the 900 W level loses its meaning.

What would make sense is 900 W continuous allowed load and an allowed overload of 1000 W for 10 seconds every 200 seconds. Note the time restriction. It indicates that you cannot have this condition continuously, only for a limited time.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ That's a good point, overload was obviously not the correct term. So say you have a motor that is only producing 1/10th of the amount of force that it's capable of and a load is applied that causes the motor to spin opposite of the way that it is trying to spin? In this case the load is less than maximum allowed load, but more than the force that the motor is currently outputting. What is the correct term for this? \$\endgroup\$
    – aball6412
    Commented Jun 17, 2018 at 19:45
3
\$\begingroup\$

There are "torque motors" which are designed to operate continuously stalled.

Most motors can be operated stalled provided the current is kept within appropriate limits, though they may not be designed for that operation (for example, the cooling may not be optimal because no internal fan is spinning).

An example from the distant past might be a motor that drives a reel to keep the magnetic tape taut as it emerges from the capstan drive in an old-fashioned reel-to-reel tape drive.

This is not considered 'overload' but just a mode of operation.

\$\endgroup\$
1
\$\begingroup\$

The ability of a motor to operate at low speed and high torque - in the extreme, to operate while stalled - is a matter of thermal design of the motor, providing a thermal path which will allow the motor to survive.

This is not normally done, since it produces a bulky, heavy motor which also needs careful attention to how and where it is mounted. After all, if the heat produced by the motor can't go anywhere the temperature will rise (more or less) indefinitely.

There is a class of motors which does this, and they are generally called torque motors . They are intended for high-torque, low-speed operation, and are commonly rated for continuous stall. As direct-drive motors, the load is connected directly to their shafts, and the body is commonly press-fit into a metal housing, which allows good heat transfer.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks for the answer! When you say that they are "commonly rated for continuous stall" does that also include forcing the motor into reverse (so beyond simply stalling it to 0 rpm)? Also, it appears that I was not using the word "overloading" correctly. Is there a word for forcing the motor to spin in the opposite direction as to what it's trying to rotate in? (assuming that the motor is NOT currently operating at full torque) \$\endgroup\$
    – aball6412
    Commented Jun 17, 2018 at 18:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ Electronic braking is an example of a motor producing torque opposite the direction of rotation. A little different in explanation than what you describe, but the same in effect. In a personal transporter like a segway or self balancing unicycle, these regimes managed by the controller are all practically continuous with one another - on the grand scale as you ride up, over, and down a hill, on the small one to correct as riders stance / balance oscillates around where it should be for that rate of travel. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 17, 2018 at 23:04
0
\$\begingroup\$

DC winches with brushed motors yield the highest torque and RPM depends on number of poles .

Gear reduction also transforms torque while the product with speed RPM is almost equal power on both sides with some gear losses in between.

The cooling is normally fan driven on the motor rotor if designed for high power in a small weight.

Normally if a fuse blows to protect the motor it leaves the motor to free wheel so and better electronic protection from overload is to open the electronic switches or typically a solenoid.

While shorting the motor to act as a safety brake, might be a good idea but adds extra cost.

The also have manual dial controlled brakes since an operator should be nearby.

\$\endgroup\$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.