The original version of the question was:
Now, this isn't a terrible question, but it isn't a great one either. For one thing, it doesn't specify the database product. The general (broad!) approach might be similar for all products, but the specific actions a database expert might take likely would vary a lot.
What types of questions should I avoid asking?
You should only ask practical, answerable questions based on actual problems that you face. Chatty, open-ended questions diminish the usefulness of our site and push other questions off the front page.
What does it mean if a question is "closed" or "on hold"?
- too broad - if your question could be answered by an entire book, or has many valid answers, it's probably too broad for our format
Your question received an early down vote, which is a signal that something about your question could be improved. In addition, users began to comment explaining what they felt the problems with your question were.
Around the same time, an initial vote to close as off-topic initiated a community review. That process is ongoing, with the question so far receiving four of the five community votes needed to place the question on hold, pending improvement.
At minimum, the question needed to be tagged with sql-server instead of sql (there was no SQL query) and/or to mention that you were asking about SQL Server in the question. Even so, it would still be a rather chatty, open-ended question with many valid possible answers. It definitely needed a tighter focus.
Since the close review was started, the question has been edited several times to improve it, which is precisely the outcome down/close votes and the "on hold" status are intended to encourage. The question is in much better shape now than when it started. In particular, you added an example, and more specific questions:
Regarding the question you compare yours to: that is an old question (from January 2011) that just happened to be bumped to the front page when I retagged it earlier. Our standards have changed over time, as the site has matured (we were still in public beta at the time). A similar question would likely not be well-received here today. It may well be locked at some stage.
The close review on your question can also be completed by three community votes to leave it open, but that hasn't happened yet. If the question does remain open, the close votes will age away over time unless retracted. If the question is placed on hold, you can follow the advice in What if I disagree with the closure of a question? How can I reopen it?
Update: The question was placed on hold (review history) and subsequently reopened by four community votes plus mine (timeline).
I have notified the voters listed that this meta question has been asked, in case they want to explain their reasoning.